From: Ray Dickenson <r.dickenson.nul> Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 21:11:17 +0100 Archived: Tue, 02 Jul 2013 06:16:00 -0400 Subject: Re: Binding Force Detector By Bill Beaty? >From: William Treurniet <wtreurniet.nul> >To: post.nul >Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2013 09:50:13 -0400 >Subject: Re: Binding Force Detector By Bill Beaty? >>From: Ray Dickenson <r.dickenson.nul> >>To: <post.nul> >>Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2013 18:48:44 +0100 >>Subject: Re: Binding Force Detector By Bill Beaty? <snip> >>No. it's not just a matter of accuracy, it's the fact that the >>various elements can be affected in perhaps opposing ways and, >>more serious, that the calibrating and measuring devices _will_ >>be affected too - probably cancelling-out any 'real' effect. >Interesting suggestions, Ray, but this all started with the ETs' >instructions to Wilbert Smith on how to design a measuring >instrument for detecting regions of reduced binding force. Smith >says, "we were informed that means for detecting them were >easily within our technology and that we should build suitable >instruments and then pay attention to what they registered." >http://www.treurniet.ca/Smith/BindingForce.htm >Presumably, the ETs knew what they were talking about, and they >did not share your concerns. Also, the device that Smith built >did work. He found large areas where the meter showed >significant deviations, as did a military pilot flying the North >Atlantic. In the latter test, the "instruments took on a >permanent deflection showing that the vortex drove them beyond >their elastic limits". >Smith acknowledged the calibration issue, but had to make do >with an instrument that showed only qualitative differences >among geographical locations. <snip> Hello William, Sorry I can't just accept other people's assumptions, as you do, about best methods for detecting the binding force, or about the reasonings and motivations of their sources - to me that's all unknown territory. All I can do is start from (fairly) solid ground by defining the attributes of a binding force, their (graduated) effects on particular states of matter, and hence some ways of detecting those graduations of effect; hopefully in real-time and using reliable, portable equipment. Looking ahead it seems to me the 'best' and most accurate method will involve monitoring the inertial behaviour of electrons - which can probably be done in a 'pack-of-cards' sized module (someone might even design an 'app' for a smartphone to do it). I.e. as we see from many accounts and reports, the UFO/ET use of the 'binding force' results in observed changes in electromagnetic fields, both in car engines and in the brains of nearby humans. Cheers Ray D Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp