UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2013 > Apr > Apr 27

Re: Brazilian MoD Discusses UFOs With Ufologists

From: Edward Gehrman <egehrman.nul>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 08:15:20 -0700
Archived: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 08:11:03 -0400
Subject: Re: Brazilian MoD Discusses UFOs With Ufologists

>From: Jerome Clark <jkclark.nul>
>To: post.nul
>Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 06:49:46 -0500
>Subject: Re: Brazilian MoD Discusses UFOs With Ufologists

>Sadly, that you are making no visible effort to take your
>"evidence" to those who could evaluate it and do something about
>it - and clearly have no intention ever of doing so (all the
>while, by the way, escalating the magnitude of your already
>extraordinary claims by tossing wild conspiracy theories into
>the mix) - tells us that even you have a pretty good
>understanding of how much weight your "evidence" carries. By
>which, of course, I mean how little.


You don't have the slightest notion of what my "evidence"
carries. You've never studied it. Being an orderly and working
in the ERs and surgeries of several large hospitals in
Albuquerque and San Francisco during the late 1950s gave me an
advantage when the Alien Autopsy footage was shown on Fox TV. It
immediately caught my attention because of the authenticity of
the surgical instruments and the body language of the surgeons
and the surgical nurse. I decided to investigate it further.
Those investigations eventually led to the monotreme hypothesis.

I'm a nobody,(a special education teacher for thirty-five
years). In 1989 I began writing a few short essays on
environmental matters but I've never written a book, nor had any
desire to be a superstar. Until the AA came into my life, I had
only a minor interest in UFO matters.

For the last eighteen years, I and a few other researchers have
been collecting all information pertaining to the nature of the
AA. Our most important discoveries were finding the crash site
in Socorro the cameraman described and to which he gave
directions, and the discovery of the Roswell crash site. I think
this information is important to the understanding of UFO
phenomena, but I realize that not many agree.

It hasn't been easy trying to discuss a subject that everyone
"knows" is a hoax. I've focused on you because, as I wrote you
many years ago, if I can convince you to take another look, I
can convince anyone. Besides, I can always count on you to
respond. Is there something wrong with that strategy?

But so far, I haven't been very successful. Not only have you
refused to examine our evidence, but your demeaning tone has
influenced others to ignore it as well. But there's always a
hope for redemption so I'll try again. What are the problems
with this "evidence"?



Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast



These contents above are copyright of the author and
UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced
without the express permission of both parties and
are intended for educational use only.