From: Ray Dickenson <r.dickenson.nul> Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 18:52:11 +0100 Archived: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 06:48:44 -0400 Subject: FTL - 'The Final Straw' Hello All, Just listing the problems with Einstein's Relativity, which Einstein himself began to doubt in later years: "I consider it quite possible that physics cannot be based on the field concept, i.e., on continuous structures. In that case, nothing remains of my entire castle in the air, gravitation theory included, [and of] the rest of modern physics." - Albert Einstein 1954 www.spaceandmotion.com/quantum-theory-albert-einstein-quotes.htm a) The 'speed of gravity'. Every experiment designed to prove that gravity travels at light-speed - i.e. as per Relativity - has failed, but more important, much independent work including that of NASA indicates that gravity is approximately "instantaneous over arbitrary distance" [that phrase is significant - you might recognize it from 'entanglement' descriptions]. www.metaresearch.org/cosmology/speed_of_gravity.asp www.metaresearch.org/cosmology/gravity/speed_limit.asp b) Spiral galaxies' (outer) rotation velocity. To try to save Relativty, big-science had to invent 'dark matter' to account for the galactic rotation speed. But that created more problems (and paradoxes). I.e. with dark matter the Universe must stop expanding and must collapse - but that isn't happening. In fact the Universe's expansion is accelerating! So big-science then had to also invent 'dark energy' to account for the observed expansion! The problem for big-science is that there are no 'factual' reasons to believe in dark matter or dark energy: no evidence for them exists. Big-science merely invented them to save Relativity. The paradoxes? i) The amount of visible matter in the Universe is about right for the observed expansion of the Universe; ii) The relative density of the Universe (Omega) which has been measured by various methods (eg, by Beatrice Tinsley et al) and always comes out at ~0.1 to ~0.3, is much too low even for balance or stasis (a critical Omega of 1.0). In fact an Omega of around 0.25 is about right for the observed expansion of the Universe. www.perceptions.couk.com/uef/ansci8.html#grav-t Any rational person would look at _all_ the evidence and, using Occam, would say that Einstein's Relativity cannot be 'true' - especially at large scales (like spiral galaxies). But big- science is no longer rational - it has painted itself into a corner, by its 'unscientific' behaviour. I think FTL evidence would only be the 'final straw' - and about time too! BTW - that 'unscientific' behaviour description is from Popper - he would have said that inventing dark matter and dark energy was merely "innoculating the theory (Relativity) against failure" and that the Theory therefore loses credibility. Cheers Ray D Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp