UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2011 > Sep > Sep 30

FTL - 'The Final Straw'

From: Ray Dickenson <r.dickenson.nul>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 18:52:11 +0100
Archived: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 06:48:44 -0400
Subject: FTL - 'The Final Straw'


Hello All,

Just listing the problems with Einstein's Relativity, which
Einstein himself began to doubt in later years: "I consider it
quite possible that physics cannot be based on the field
concept, i.e., on continuous structures. In that case, nothing
remains of my entire castle in the air, gravitation theory
included, [and of] the rest of modern physics." - Albert
Einstein 1954

www.spaceandmotion.com/quantum-theory-albert-einstein-quotes.htm

a) The 'speed of gravity'. Every experiment designed to prove
that gravity travels at light-speed - i.e. as per Relativity -
has failed, but more important, much independent work including
that of NASA indicates that gravity is approximately
"instantaneous over arbitrary distance" [that phrase is
significant - you might recognize it from 'entanglement'
descriptions].

www.metaresearch.org/cosmology/speed_of_gravity.asp

www.metaresearch.org/cosmology/gravity/speed_limit.asp

b) Spiral galaxies' (outer) rotation velocity. To try to save
Relativty, big-science had to invent 'dark matter' to account
for the galactic rotation speed. But that created more problems
(and paradoxes). I.e. with dark matter the Universe must stop
expanding and must collapse - but that isn't happening. In fact
the Universe's expansion is accelerating! So big-science then
had to also invent 'dark energy' to account for the observed
expansion!

The problem for big-science is that there are no 'factual'
reasons to believe in dark matter or dark energy: no evidence
for them exists. Big-science merely invented them to save
Relativity.

The paradoxes?

i) The amount of visible matter in the Universe is about right
for the observed expansion of the Universe;

ii) The relative density of the Universe (Omega) which has been
measured by various methods (eg, by Beatrice Tinsley et al) and
always comes out at ~0.1 to ~0.3, is much too low even for
balance or stasis (a critical Omega of 1.0). In fact an Omega of
around 0.25 is about right for the observed expansion of the
Universe.

www.perceptions.couk.com/uef/ansci8.html#grav-t

Any rational person would look at _all_ the evidence and, using
Occam, would say that Einstein's Relativity cannot be 'true' -
especially at large scales (like spiral galaxies). But big-
science is no longer rational - it has painted itself into a
corner, by its 'unscientific' behaviour.

I think FTL evidence would only be the 'final straw' - and about
time too!


BTW - that 'unscientific' behaviour description is from Popper -
he would have said that inventing dark matter and dark energy
was merely "innoculating the theory (Relativity) against
failure" and that the Theory therefore loses credibility.


Cheers

Ray D



Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast

At:

http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/

These contents above are copyright of the author and
UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced
without the express permission of both parties and
are intended for educational use only.

[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp


Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com