From: Kathy Kasten <catraja.nul> Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 18:47:20 +0000 Archived: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 10:31:31 -0400 Subject: Re: Roswell Debris Sample Disappears En Route >From: Jack Brewer <brewer.jack.nul> >To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <post.nul> >Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 19:21:21 -0700 (PDT) >Subject: Re: Roswell Debris Sample Disappears En Route >>From: Kathy Kasten <catraja.nul> >>To: ufo-updates-list.nul >>Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 15:26:05 +0000 >>Subject: Re: Roswell Debris Sample Disappears En Route >>My own thought is that two tests were done already, both tests >>resulted in the samples being of earthly material. No >>abnormalities were found. Under normal circumstances, that >>should be the end of the matter. >I can think of many good reasons that if Kimbler's find is >conclusively established to be earthly material, as I suspect >competent and unbiased analysis would confirm, it should not be >the end of the matter - not just yet. As a matter of fact, I can >think of several circumstances of potential great interest and >significance, pending further quality research. Jack: The problem I had with both Ed's and Kimbler's "reports" is that they did not meet any academic level. And, yes, I read what Ed sent me which was an article he wrote not a field report. Both these "collectors" state they are academically trained and I was expecting a field report. What I got were articles and interviews. Not the same thing. Of course, I paid attention to what Ed wrote. What he wrote did not meet any academic criterion. My thought was if investigators want to be taken seriously, they need to write serious reports. My intention was to help Ed rewrite his report into an academic paper. Like they say, "no good deed goes unrewarded." Apparently, he didn't like my suggestions and basically stomped off - verbally. What I find really remarkable - and have written an article on for a ufo magazine - is that no one read Dr. William Doleman's Roswell Dig report. An excellent example of how a field report is written. Plus, pre and post notes on the dig. The bottomline was stated by Kimbler in his interview: that two test results determines the outcome. The point being that both tests conclusively revealed earthly materials. Yes, that result does not support the belief of the collector. However, it does support a very different and disturbing evidence of a horrible accident possibly of exotic air craft and a very brave pilot. KK Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp