From: Edward Gehrman <egehrman.nul> Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 08:08:14 -0700 Archived: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 16:19:28 -0400 Subject: Re: Roswell Debris Sample Disappears En Route >From: Edward Gehrman <egehrman.nul> >To: <post.nul> >Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 15:05:45 -0700 >Subject: Re: Roswell Debris Sample Disappears En Route >>From: Kathy Kasten <catraja.nul> >>To: <post.nul> >>Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 17:41:11 +0000 >>Subject: Re: Roswell Debris Sample Disappears En Route >>I can imagine at this point - with the first few testing >>results - Kimbler is having trouble getting funding for more >>tests. >Kathy, List, EBK, >Frank doesn't have any problem with funding. I offered to pay >for the testing of his metal sample by X-Ray diffraction at a >lab I used recently. I didn't need to inform that lab about the >circumstances of my collection or the location. I was as vague >as possible. They were interested but didn't press me for more >information. >I was very satisfied with the results. There are no reasons that >I can see for two X-Ray diffraction tests on the same material. >These folks don't usually make mistakes. An X-Ray diffraction >should produce the same results no matter where it takes place, >as long as it test the exact same material. There isn't any room >for much speculation. >I was quoting from Kimbler's own words provided in the article >in Open Minds. Kathy, List, EBK, Yes, I understand, but I wanted you to understand that funding wasn't a problem if Frank allowed me to help out. I volunteered to fund Frank because I wanted him to see what he could metal detect at the MP's site. The MP's site is what was the final resting spot of the Roswell UFO. >My own thought is that two tests were done already, both tests >resulted in the samples being of earthly material. No >abnormalities were found. Under normal circumstances, that >should be the end of the matter. Just because a sample consists of earthly material doesn't disqualify it as evidence. >I would like to comment on the fact that neither you nor Mr. >Kimbler have produced an academically standard report of your >finds. As a matter of fact, after reading your article, I made >several suggestions to firm up your theory. You cut off >communications with me. Providing the exact location of the loci >site was only one of the suggestions. You didn't read my report; you didn't pay attention; you were not interested in studying my evidence or what it meant. You were not seriously trying to understand how the evidence I've collected connects to the Roswell mystery or the reality of the Alien Autopsy. Most of your replies were off the subject, so I decided to end our discussion. I believe that I've solved the Roswell incident and found the crash site where the craft came down, after exploding over the Foster ranch and depositing a half mile of strange debris. Frank's metal fragments could be from that explosion. I will provide the exact location of my sites on a need to know basis. They are fragile and would be easy to disrupt and damage. Ed Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp