From: Kathy Kasten <catraja.nul> Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 17:41:11 +0000 Archived: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 08:05:18 -0400 Subject: Re: Roswell Debris Sample Disappears En Route >From: Jack Brewer <brewer.jack.nul> >To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <post.nul> >Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 19:37:38 -0700 (PDT) >Subject: Re: Roswell Debris Sample Disappears En Route Jack: Test Confirms Roswell Debris Is Not From Earth First and foremost readers need to understand that one of the staff writers for Open Minds interviewed Frank Kimbler and based the misleading heading of the article on information provided during the interview. I am in agreement with Mr. Kimbler's desire to find physical evidence from the so-called crash site. Yes, he did find a "burn area" on a Landsat image; went to the area and pick up some artifacts from the area. He noted some pieces he found looked shredded. A possible indication of an explosion. Roswell's International UFO Museum decided to fund a first test at New Mexico Tech in Socorro using a micro-probe. The test of the samples resulted in contents of aluminum, silicon, manganese, and copper alloy. All known earthy metals. The form was unusual. It was a foil form. Based on my own research I would say that form is within the realm of possibilities for a terrestrial craft - although exotic. Next, Kimbler took the samples to U of New Mexico Insti. of Meteorites. Kimbler was not upfront with the unnamed "expert." When Kimbler did reveal where the material was from, the "expert" refused to run the tests. It should be noted that what Kimbler told the lab expert is not disclosed in the article.. A second unnamed "expert" at the same institute confirmed the first results from NM Tech. Then, Kimbler approached Bigelow Aerospace who expressed an interest in determining the contents of Kimbler's samples. After months, Bigelow showed little or no results. Instead, Kimbler used Dr. Peter Sturrock's analysis of something called the Ubatuba UFO fragment and Kimbler attempted to do a plot line. His results were "either an analytical error or the material is not from Earth." Although it is necessary to have two or three labs agree with the results, Kimbler - quoted in the article - leaps to the conclusion that the aluminum is of unearthly origin and that the aluminum in his samples was manufactured elsewhere, i.e., off planet. I can imagine at this point - with the first few testing results - Kimbler is having trouble getting funding for more tests. My question has been, after the Roswell Dig, what happened to those samples. Now probably now totally deteriorated. It would have been nice for a professional testing approach with those samples as it would have meant that a comparison could have been done. Another lost opportunity for real science in the field. Or, is everybody afraid what the tests would reveal an Earthly origin. KK Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp