From: Gildas Bourdais <bourdais.gildas.nul> Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 17:19:40 +0200 Archived: Sun, 29 May 2011 15:56:53 -0400 Subject: Re: Review Of Jacobsen's Area 51 Book >From: Kathy Kasten <catraja.nul> >To: <post.nul> >Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 18:57:10 +0000 >Subject: Re: Review Of Jacobsen's Area 51 Book >>From: Terry W. Colvin <fortean1.nul> >>To: post.nul >>Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 20:17:54 -0500 (GMT-05:00) >>Subject: Review Of Jacobsen's Area 51 Book >>----- >>Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 11:50:05 -0500 >>From: Jay Miller <aerofax.nul> >>Subject: Some Interesting Links Including A-12 At Area 51 >>To all, >>Did a review of the new Area 51 book by Annie Jacobsen for ABC >>News. >>In summary, it's a golden opportunity missed. ><snip> >>I am, to put it mildly, sorely disappointed in this book. Any >>"non- fiction" history of Area 51 that claims the Roswell, NM >>flying saucer crap as the site's raison d'etre and that the >>flying saucer itself was the end product of Russia's post-war >>collaboration with the Horton Brothers isn't worthy of being a >>door stop, much less an historical resource in my reference >>library. >>Don't waste your money - not even the photos are fresh. >Oh well, I never heard of Jay Miller. I have to wonder why Annie >Jacobsen have an opinion about Roswell. At least, because she >claims to be an investigative journalist, she documents her >sources and they are viable - people who were affiliated with >Area 51 and Lockheed. >Let's be real clear about the myth of Roswell: all opinions are >based on rumors, second, third, fourth hand testimonies, so- >called "death bed" confessions, etc., etc. BUT, there isn't a >shred of anything to support any theory. So, the tale is up for >grabs. I think Jacobsen's opinion is just as valid's as any that >has gone before hers. She is just more created and very much >outside the box of the ufo orthodoxy. Kathy, There is one point of agreement between us: Annie Jacobsen has been fed one of the craziest tales ever invented about Roswell. Now, please note that it has been told to her by two former engineers of Area 51, people who know quite well what it's worth: A blatant pack of lies. So this is a case of indubitable disinformation, directly from Area 51. It does not require a huge effort of imagination to grasp that they probably participate in an effort to hide certain things about Ufos, more precisely about the Roswell case. The fact that a graduate from a prestigious university dares to write such baloney in a book, illustrates the deepness of the usual ignorance on the suject, even in well educated circles. And your conclusion that her tale is jut as good as any other on Roswell is exactly what those disinformation agents expect from you. Gildas Bourdais Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp