From: Eleanor White <ewraven1.nul> Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 17:43:07 -0400 Archived: Wed, 11 May 2011 07:03:14 -0400 Subject: More On Abductee Home Monitoring I received a private email from someone who had read my comments about the CUFOS abductee home monitoring project. I'm repeating my reply to that email because in my private reply, I outline some experiences and possibilities for future abductee monitoring experiments. Here is my reply: Abductee home monitoring is especially interesting to me, because it seems to parallel our electronic harassment community's attempts to even just video targets as they sleep or attempt to. With us, one of these things inevitably happens, as best I'm aware: - The remote electronic assaults cease as long as a camcorder or other type of recorder is running. - The camcorder or recorder is remotely shut off. This includes physically moving slide or toggle switches remotely. - The camcorder or recorder is blasted with loud static, (or electrically noisy signal if an audio channel isn't in use) causing snow on the video track. - The camcorder or recorder will simply be blanked and record nothing, even though it is running. - Occasionally, the camcorder or recorder is remotely made to totally fail and cannot be re-started. But curiously, if the failed item is put on the shelf for a few months, it suddenly "fixes itself" and works perfectly again. This happens, too, to all manner of electronic/ electrical equipment which is not used for recording. Clearly, the 'entities' responsible for the e-harassment do not want recorded evidence to be obtained. I don't know about the details of how the abductee home recording equipment failed, of course, but it does sound very familiar. The ultimate is that 'Skinwalker Ranch' pair of remote camcorders watching one another, in which the total physical destruction of one was not picked up by the other. (Not sure if the observing camera stopped or was blanked.) I do think this kind of research is worth pursuing, but to be affordable, the prototype setup should probably be done with just one abductee, until a system is developed which is reliable. In our group, because ordinary electromagnetic test equipment will often pick up nothing even during periods of very aggressive assault, we theorize that only a recording EEG unit, ideally a medical grade unit, might at least show substantial excursions from normal brain signal during these assaults. Such a recorded EEG trace, together with an audio recording by the target in which the target announces date and exact time of the event, and a description of the assault would at least provide skeptical officials with an inkling that some real event was happening. If the recorder was stopped, blanked out, or blasted with static during the noted assault, that too would be evidence for our purposes. The hope would be that some sort of further investigation might be offered by the skeptical officials as a result. [We haven't tried this because part of the harassment is sleep deprivation and character assassination, resulting in poverty.] I'm wondering if that might be useful for abduction events? Since Cleve Backster's experiments with his philodendron plants connected to his polygraph showed apparent 'bonding' between plant and owner, even over significant distances, another experiment which might be useful for abductions is to have the abductee care for a plant for a while, and a philodendron might be a good starting point. Then, an EEG machine has electrodes bonded to the upper and lower sides of a [healthy] leaf with agar (used by Cleve Backster). During an abduction event, it might be very interesting to see what the previoiusly bonded _plant_ might show on its EEG trace. I tried this with a simple, single channel EEG unit connected to a philodendron, next to my bed. The harassers either blasted the unit with static, or the plant flatlined. I could not get a single night where the plant EEG was normal, when I was trying to get some confirmation that a remote assault of some type was happening. According to Cleve Backster (in the book "Secret Life of Plants") plants do flat line when extremely stressful things are happening, particularly when someone who has been cruel to plants was present. So I don't know if the flatlining was electronic, or the plant was picking up something stressful. I did duplicate Backster's experiment when he took a lighter and threatened to burn the plant, and the plant responded with wildly exaggerated EEG traces. My unit only has a meter, and a geiger- counter like speaker as output, but it was plain that plant was 'terrified.' One thing I wonder about is if there are now small enough recording GPS units which an abductee might wear around a wrist or ankle, using a sturdy strap of some sort. That recording GPS on the boat did work, after all. So I think there may be experiments with abductees well worth doing and maybe with newer equipment, the experiments might be more affordable. Eleanor White Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp