UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2011 > May > May 7

Re: Time For CUFOS To Release Abductee Home Data

From: Steven Kaeser <steve.nul>
Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 14:37:48 -0400
Archived: Sat, 07 May 2011 07:37:12 -0400
Subject: Re: Time For CUFOS To Release Abductee Home Data

>From: Jerome Clark <jkclark.nul>
>To: <post.nul>
>Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 09:23:03 -0500
>Subject: Re: Time For CUFOS To Release Abductee Home Data

>>From: Steven Kaeser <steve.nul>
>>To: <post.nul>
>>Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 07:26:00 -0400
>>Subject: Re: Time For CUFOS To Release Abductee Home Data

>>>From: Eleanor White <ewraven1.nul>
>>>To: post.nul
>>>Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 16:48:25 -0400
>>>Subject: Re: Time For CUFOS To Release Abductee Home Data

>>>>From: Steven Kaeser <steve.nul>
>>>>To: <post.nul>,
>>>>Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 09:03:31 -0400
>>>>Subject: Re: Time For CUFOS To Release Abductee Home Data?

>>The other side of this study were the notes kept by the subjects
>>that were used to correlate anomalous environmental readings,
>>and I have not heard of any 'events' that were recorded by them.
>>Now, does that mean that the abductors kept their distance, or
>>that they were able to completely avoid detection, or perhaps
>>it's all psychological and the subjects were aware that they
>>were being monitored? Without a real analysis, I don't think we
>>learn much.

>Though even if it 'failed' in the sense that it filmed no
>abductions, the project was worth doing. If it had 'succeeded' -
>that is, filmed abduction-related activity - that would have
>been thrilling both for the scientific data gathered and for the
>chance to demonstrate them to a world that heretofore had done
>nothing but scoff at such experiences. I do suspect, however,
>that a properly funded effort which could have been seen through
>to its conclusion would have arrived at the same results.


I certainly agree that the Project was worth the effort. Let me
clarify for some who aren't aware of details, this was not a
"filming" effort, per se. It was an effort to monitor
environmental levels, and not to get a picture. There have been
a few cases where video cameras were set up to monitor potential
abductions, but the AMP project was attempting to add measurable
data to the anecdotal landscape.  To avoid the issue of having
someone tamper with the system, the variables being monitored
were not disclosed beyond a few people, and the data was
automatically phoned to a central location daily, where it was
gathered for later analysis when the daily logs were obtained.

The concern that I would have in releasing the raw data (if that
was permissible under privacy requirements) is that it doesn't
appear to show anything clearly and it would give a lot of data
for everyone to draw their own conclusions as they pick and
choose among the data points in question. The validity of this
project rested in the fact that a disinterested third party
would perform the analysis, and not someone involved in the

To be honest, it was very difficult trying to find subjects for
this study, which caused it to drag out and cost more than it
should have.  Of course, there were also equipment failures and
other issues that delayed completion. The individual who was
funding the UFO Research Coalition (primarily for this project)
became less and less interested as time wore on, and in the end
he decided enough was enough.


While I helped set up the detection system and take initial
measurements for one subject, I have not been intimately
involved in it.

Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast



These contents above are copyright of the author and
UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced
without the express permission of both parties and
are intended for educational use only.

[ Next Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp

Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com