From: Kathy Kasten <catraja.nul> Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 20:15:44 +0000 Archived: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 06:12:56 -0500 Subject: Recommendation? Why Delanoy's Paper? Experimental Evidence Suggestive of Anomalous Consciousness Interactions by Deborah Delanoy Recommended by John Rimmer(I think??) My comment: what a waste of everybody's time. Good thing I read most of the papers cited in the reference because Delanoy's article shows a decline in the education system. No original work. Just using the already published research and pretending to analyze it. Yeah, yeah, I know she provides the criteria for her _statistical_ analysis. It is the statistical analysis of analysis. As if that is somehow relevant to the research under discussion. The only positive comment I can make: It is a very professional looking paper. The really interesting thing about this article is that John considered it important. The article does mirror how data is being published within the UFO community. I would call it: good old reliable rehash. No new opinions. No new research. Just a revised collection of the same old cases. The new aspect: yet, another ufo researcher adds their name in support of a possible hoax without digging into the story behind the data. Thanks John. I am now know there has been a failure of teaching critical thinking on both sides of the Atlantic. KK Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp