From: Ray Dickenson <r.dickenson.nul> Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 12:24:00 -0000 Archived: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 07:53:05 -0500 Subject: Re: Abduction Story By Sammy Hagar >From: Rick Nielsen <nilthchi.nul> >Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 19:51:14 -0700 (PDT) >To: post.nul >Subject: Re: Abduction Story By Sammy Hagar >>From: Diana Cammack <cammack.nul> >>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <post.nul> >>Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 21:51:58 +0200 >>Subject: Abduction Story By Sammy Hagar >>http://tinyurl.com/4g754qe >>March 21, 2011 >>Sammy Hagar Says He Was Abducted By Aliens <snip> >Beyond the quick response that this may be just so much book >promotion, I have a question: >Even if superficially similar to other stories, how can >anecdotal information be counted on? Don't know Rick, but it certainly is, every working day in courtrooms around the world. Which reminds me, I'm still looking for an attribution to this quote: "Nobody who totally rejects anecdotal evidence can ever ethically serve on a jury." I've got it down as 'anonymous & anecdotal'. Personally think one can only ask - "Is the witness telling self-perceived truth, or consciously lying?". And even if the answer is `Yes', and the witness is a `scientist', that doesn't guarantee anything much. Cheers Ray D Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp