UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2011 > Mar > Mar 11

Re: Scrap Propaganda Address The Issues

From: Gildas Bourdais <bourdais.gildas.nul>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 11:41:07 +0100
Archived: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 07:50:11 -0500
Subject: Re: Scrap Propaganda Address The Issues

>From: Carol Rainey <csrainey2.nul>
>To: post.nul
>Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 00:21:49 -0500
>Subject: Scrap Propaganda Address The Issues [was: The
>Assassination Of Hopkins & Cortile]

>>From: Kathy Kasten <catraja.nul>
>>To: post.nul
>>Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 20:39:35 +0000
>>Subject: Re: The Assassination Of Hopkins & Cortile


>>Wow, not just discrediting Hopkins and Cortile, but Carol Rainey
>>is assassinating them. Isn't that hyperbole a little over the

>Hello, Concerned Listers,

>I'd like to directly address the flying accusations about my bad
>taste in timing and lack of concern for "the dying Hopkins." The
>propagandists are taking an easy, sentimental potshot at my
>persistence in disclosing what I feel are faulty, sometimes
>harmful, and virtually worthless research methods practiced by
>the two best-known alien abduction researchers. No, the research
>isn't worthless in the sense that many, many people who have
>come to Hopkins and Jacobs have felt relieved simply by having
>someone listen to and empathize with them.

>But current abduction research methods are practically worthless
>in having brought us any verifiable knowledge about a real and
>puzzling phenomenon that troubles many experiencers. And that is
>a serious ethical problem - to continue escalating a narrative
>that has no basis in tried-and-true methods of science or even
>in experimental or hybrid methodology.

>Back to my "bad taste." Let me tell you, folks, there are three
>simple facts here: Simple Fact One - that I care very much about
>Budd, my former husband of ten years, although I no longer
>admire him. And no one has the right to ask me to explain that.
>It simply is.

>And Simple Fact Number Two is that I'm dying, too, you're dying,
>we're all dying. Some are a little closer to the finish line
>than others. But if you have a truth to speak out, you'd damn
>well better do it now. I no more know when my time is up than
>did John Mack - vigorous, full of new challenges - on the day we
>spoke on the phone as he was packing to leave for England.He
>told me of his newest interest - the possibility of life after
>death - and we promised to pick up the topic after he returned.
>And, of course, then came the rush of the proverbial truck and
>he never returned. I never got to hear what was leading him on.

>I'm saying what I need to say because it would be dishonest not
>to while I still have a tongue. I am speaking out to apologize
>for any possible harm that my secondary role with Budd's
>subjects might have caused. If they experienced none, so much
>the better.

>Now we come to Simple Fact Number Three about "the dying man"
>story: I'm here in Manhattan and those who criticize me are not
>even close. In an "only in Manhattan" scenario, I still live in
>the same house with Budd, two floors down, in the lower artist's
>studio. We cross paths irregularly and are civil to one another
>as we do. I am aware, as I am writing, that Budd is up and
>functioning, doing his own laundry on the main floor we share,
>going outside shortly after a blizzard to get his own liquor or
>to make a drugstore or food run.

>He has no constant, live-in care. He is not in hospice. He took
>care of himself through most of the terrible blizzards of this
>past amazing winter in New York.

>And, fifteen minutes ago, the "dying man" was seen walking quite
>spryly up 16th Street with a friend I think of vaguely as
>"Citizen Kane."

>I'd say that Budd Hopkins, although coping with a serious
>illness, is still very much up and swinging.

>I should know.

>Now, would it be possible to actually discuss the _issues_ about
>alien abduction research?


I think you are the one who poses a "serious ethical problem".
I am baffled to see how you are still around, spying on him.
If you still care for your ex-husband, the best you can do for him
is to leave him alone, now.

You have harmed him enough.

How can you call him, coldly, "the dying man"? This is really

Gildas Bourdais

Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast



These contents above are copyright of the author and
UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced
without the express permission of both parties and
are intended for educational use only.

[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp

Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com