From: Jerome Clark <jkclark.nul> Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 14:06:34 -0600 Archived: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 07:33:17 -0500 Subject: Re: The Assassination Of Hopkins & Cortile >From: Jerome Clark <jkclark.nul> >To: <post.nul> >Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 13:16:57 -0600 >Subject: Re: The Assassination Of Hopkins & Cortile >>From: SMiles Lewis <elfis.nul> >>To: post.nul >>Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 10:37:41 -0800 (PST) >>Subject: Re: The Assassination Of Hopkins & Cortile >>The "assassination" of (or rather the attempts to warn against >>and improve upon) Abduction research began some time ago: >Nah, it's just ufology up to what it loves to do: eat its own. <snip> >Does this mean that we have to refight this one now? Does >somebody have to retype Greg Sandow's independent investigation >(published in IUR in the late 1990s, and not on line as far as I >can tell), which challenges the Hansen/Stefula charges on a >number of crucial points? I have since located Part 2 of Sandow's investigative piece on line. It's here: http://tinyurl.com/5rkh933 I offer this, incidentally, for its historical interest, not with the intention or re-igniting an ancient conflict which should be left to rest in peace. Jerry Clark Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp