From: Gildas Bourdais <bourdais.gildas.nul>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 12:32:40 +0100
Archived: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 07:25:14 -0500
Subject: Re: Sakulich And The Betty & Barney Hill Case 


>From: Kevin Randle <KRandle993.nul>
>To: post.nul
>Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 15:16:42 EST
>Subject: Re: Sakulich And The Betty & Barney Hill Case


><snip>

>So, while you might not find the information probable, it is
>important to understanding what is going on. Dismissing it
>doesn't change the relevance of it.

Kevin,

Even if Betty and Barney Hill were not completely ignorant of SF
imagery, although they were not very interested, the main point
remains that Dr Simon tried repeatedly to convince them, under
hypnosis, that they had been dreaming, but he failed completely.
He admitted finally that, to them, their story was real.

That brings up a couple of points:

First, even a good professional may not be able to influence
witnesses under hypnosis. They can resist.

Second, the critique made against Budd Hopkins and others of
influencing witnesses under hypnosis and of being unethical, can
be made againt Dr Simon, the eminent professional, in the first
place. That's exacly what he did!


Gildas Bourdais





Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast

At:

http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/

These contents above are copyright of the author and
UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced
without the express permission of both parties and
are intended for educational use only.