From: Gildas Bourdais <bourdais.gildas.nul> Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 12:32:40 +0100 Archived: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 07:25:14 -0500 Subject: Re: Sakulich And The Betty & Barney Hill Case >From: Kevin Randle <KRandle993.nul> >To: post.nul >Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 15:16:42 EST >Subject: Re: Sakulich And The Betty & Barney Hill Case ><snip> >So, while you might not find the information probable, it is >important to understanding what is going on. Dismissing it >doesn't change the relevance of it. Kevin, Even if Betty and Barney Hill were not completely ignorant of SF imagery, although they were not very interested, the main point remains that Dr Simon tried repeatedly to convince them, under hypnosis, that they had been dreaming, but he failed completely. He admitted finally that, to them, their story was real. That brings up a couple of points: First, even a good professional may not be able to influence witnesses under hypnosis. They can resist. Second, the critique made against Budd Hopkins and others of influencing witnesses under hypnosis and of being unethical, can be made againt Dr Simon, the eminent professional, in the first place. That's exacly what he did! Gildas Bourdais Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp