From: Don Ledger <dledger.nul> Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 20:58:28 -0300 Archived: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 06:00:25 -0400 Subject: Re: The Guys Doth Protest Too Much >From: Kathy Kasten <catraja.nul> >To: <post.nul> >Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 20:33:56 +0000 >Subject: The Guys Doth Protest Too Much >Dear Listers: >What is really interesting to me is that I am held in contempt >by most of the Listers here. This is against the rules as >stated by Errol. His rules were the reason I felt free to >express my views. This was suppose to take place providing an >atmosphere of respect. As you all know, sometimes my opinion was >taken to be an assault, although only in the mind of the reader, >I have respected all of you. My mother taught me that how I >treated other people should show them how to treat me. That has >not happened in this group. >I will continue to post because I have not violated any of >Errol's posting rules. >Regardless of all the responses to my original e-mail, there is >a problem finding a solution to highly strange events. However, >during last night's relaxation with a good cigar and stars for >company, I realized that there maybe a very strong desire not to >find a solution. It was the first time I contemplated there >might be a resistance to admitting there was a misdirection >early on the part of - the then leaders - NICAP. After all, many >of the board members had background in military intelligence. >Further, my response to all the negative vibes tossed in my >direction, I have to recognize that old saying from a guy back >in olde England: "my, my, but the lady doth protest too much." >In this case, we have to change "lady" to "the guys" protest too >much. And, fellas, you can always fall back on the fact that I >am a woman and you feel my opinion could very well be inferior >to yours. >Now, knowing that, I hope you all feel better. Seems to me you are doing most of the protesting. But usually your remarks are insulting, smug, your arguments trivial without the background research and experience displayed by most on this list. So please spare us your injured party status, KK. You are not fooling anyone. Many including myself have spent a great deal of time explaining certain aspects of this phenomenon to you while you respond only with simple minded retorts which any neophyte could come up with with little thought or any attempt at research. Your recent and uninformed response to the RB-47 case which you only stumbled across after I mentioned NICAP (which until then you probably had never heard of) to you in a response to one of your emails about the plywood wonder, Horten design of a spacecraft (Flying saucer) that despite having no engines somehow made it thousands of miles from the Soviet Union to the nuclear bomber base at Roswell. Anyway you chose to hitch a ride on Jacobsen's flight of fancy rather than listen to people who actually know what they are talking about. Your reason? You thought it wa s 'fresh' take. It was - in some respects - a fresh take on how to scam the rubes out there into buying a book that was basically full of crap. I think your willingness to buy holus bolus into Jacobsen's 'theory' was what did it for me. And this is coming from someone (me) who doesn't have a dog in the Roswell hunt. Don Ledger Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp