From: William Treurniet <wtreurniet.nul> Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 14:56:29 -0400 Archived: Wed, 08 Jun 2011 06:52:54 -0400 Subject: Re: A Haunebu II Photo Feature >From: William Sawers<orka1.nul> >To:<post.nul> >Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 17:59:16 +1000 >Subject: Re: A Haunebu II Photo Feature >>From: Gildas Bourdais<bourdais.gildas.nul> >>To: post.nul >>Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 11:18:16 +0200 >>Subject: Re: A Haunebu II Photo Feature >>>From: William Treurniet<wtreurniet.nul> >>>To: post.nul >>>Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 13:18:44 -0400 >>>Subject: Re: A Haunebu II Photo Feature ><snip> >>Many photo specialists still wonder how Billy Meier could do his >>beautiful pictures. But some of them are obvious fakes. Who made >>them? At least he was not alone. >>And who believes today in the reality of WW II Nazi flying >>saucers? Nobody found one. >>And who knows where that Haunebu picture comes from? >If I may, >Hello... umm... hello? Hard to believe this thread is still going >on... and on and on. >I think we need a Font for sarcasm, I mean it. I see no need for a bored reader of a thread to express sarcasm. Usually, the subject line is clearly displayed and so is the delete button. It's not exactly clear to me what this latest post means to imply. Does it refer to the reason for the initial post, or just to the most recent morphing of the subject? I created the thread in order to point out a possible anomaly in the space under the craft in the Haunebu photo. I saw a form there that reminded me of similar shapes I have found near UFOs in a number of other photos taken over the years. Perhaps beyond my expectation, there was a serious response from Martin Shough who disagreed vehemently with my view of this image and others I have on display. It was about evidence, contrasting one explanatory hypothesis against another. This kind of discussion happens only occasionally on this list, and I would like to see more of it. I don't think we changed each other's point of view after a number of exchanges. Nevertheless, I understand more clearly now on what basis someone might disagree with my hypothesis. No one had yet engaged me like that on this subject, and I appreciate the work Martin put into it. Hopefully, there are others here who found the controversy interesting. Regards, William Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp