From: William Treurniet <wtreurniet.nul> Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 08:18:26 -0400 Archived: Wed, 08 Jun 2011 06:43:28 -0400 Subject: Re: A Haunebu II Photo Feature >From: Ole Henningsen<oleh.nul> >To:<post.nul> >Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 00:33:18 +0200 >Subject: Re: A Haunebu II Photo Feature >>From: William Treurniet<wtreurniet.nul> >>To: post.nul >>Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 10:32:11 -0400 >>Subject: Re: A Haunebu II Photo Feature >><snip> >>>"We" dont refuse to consider "other possibilities", but when I - >>>and a lot of other old researchers in this field - look at >>>pictures with a lot of lens flares, we simply are not looking >>>for other possibilities. Why should we?? >>>If you look at a picture of a cow on a road, would you ever >>>consider "it might be some kind of a car" ??? >>Ole, I think you meant "If you look at a picture of a car on the >>road, would you ever consider 'it might be some kind of a cow'"? >>And the answer is yes, if there is a history of cows wandering >>onto the road and the object has the appearance of one of those >>cows. >Of course, William, you know better, what I mean, that I do >myself... Thatís what this discussion is about... Sorry, Ole, I was just confused about what you meant. Your analogy did not seem correct the way it was expressed. William Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp