UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2011 > Jun > Jun 5

Re: Do We Need More Evidence?

From: Greg Boone <evolbaby.nul>
Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2011 18:44:27 -0400 (EDT)
Archived: Sun, 05 Jun 2011 18:56:19 -0400
Subject: Re: Do We Need More Evidence?


>From: Kathy Kasten <catraja.nul>
>To: <post.nul>
>Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2011 20:26:21 +0000
>Subject: Re: Do We Need More Evidence?

>>From: Greg Boone <evolbaby.nul>
>>To: post.nul
>>Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2011 13:16:48 -0400 (EDT)
>>Subject: Do We Need More Evidence?

<snip>

>>So again, do we need more evidence? We've got so much that
>>pinpoints the issue and some of the best stuff was from the
>>golden age of UFOlogy. What's coming out now validates what was
>>presented by people like Keyhoe and the other pioneers in the
>>field.

>>Evidence we've got, a massive public forum, global forum, is
>>what is needed.

<snip>

>Greg:

>For an individual who has stated they are a reporter, I point to
>your comment showing that the media continues to confuse
>testimony with evidence. Testimonies are memories. Evidence is
>something any person can touch, feel and see. So, no, there is
>any hard evidence of ET craft interacting with the planet Earth.
>Just testimonies.

>Hasn't the community finally realized there will be no
>government revealing anything? It is up to the community to
>uncover the hard evidence - if there is such a thing.


Kathy, never said I'm a reporter. I was a professional
journalist and still have my skills. However I would rather take
the backseat and do simple research and send that data up to the
professional journalists and scientists who should be presenting
the info to the public.

As for hard evidence for the ETH, I agree there is no physical
proof presented to the public as a whole. There may be and we
don't recognize it, haven't had it processed, or can't get it
processed.

Not to say there isn't some in some lab or government archive.
So far it hasn't presented itself and our professionals have
enough evidence to evaluate the present evidence that supports
that theory. It depends on how much one values that professional
evaluation.

Right now, my point is there is enough evidence, an avalanche of
it to present to the public. Testimony is evidence, anecdotal
but still as valuable as any other evidence. If ten people tell
me they saw a rattlesnake in a part of the country where there
shouldn't be any, I might dismiss it but I sure am not going to
discount it. It's just memory and evaluation communicated.
Someone says they saw a UFO, okay.

Someone says they saw an extraterrestrial, how did they come to
that evaluation and conclusion? We often give names to things
that confound us as part of the descriptive. My poin tis that
there are other theories that shouldn't be tossed away
completely in favor of just one, one that was ridiculed for
decades until it became the mainstream and now to question that
theory has a flipped script so that any other theory or
explanation is ridiculed or attacked.

Dr. Greer had his Disclosure Project presentation that really
had an impact.

Having grown up in journalism I can attest that science isn't a
reporter's best leg to stand on. I'm surprised that goes on to
this day as I chat with former colleagues and new reporters
they've trained up the ranks. UFOs cover so many bodies of
science and humanities that only a well rounded intellect can
even comprehend the fundamentals. I may not agree with every
UFOlogist, especially the condescending know-it-alls, but I know
in general we can discuss geology, cosmology, chemistry, and
more in any given conversation.

So now from my viewpoint it is going to be a situation where
UFOlogists in tandem with other bodies will have to present
things to the public and that day may come soon given many of
the archaeological discoveries of the past ten years showing far
more extensive civilizations than mainstream history had been
prepared for.


Best,

Greg



Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast

At:

http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/

These contents above are copyright of the author and
UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced
without the express permission of both parties and
are intended for educational use only.

[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp


Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com