From: Gildas Bourdais <bourdais.gildas.nul> Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2011 11:04:00 +0200 Archived: Sun, 05 Jun 2011 08:04:34 -0400 Subject: Re: Review Of Jacobsen's Area 51 Book >From: Kathy Kasten <catraja.nul> >To: <post.nul> >Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2011 09:01:52 +0000 >Subject: Re: Review Of Jacobsen's Area 51 Book >>From: Don Ledger <dledger.nul> >>To: <post.nul> >>Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 14:25:45 -0300 >>Subject: Re: Review Of Jacobsen's Area 51 Book <snip> >>I think the negativity coming from you to KK is because she >>aspires to be something she doesn't have the chops for. So what >>does she do? She tries to tear down what she can't have. >>KK is not a player and never will be. You have to work for it. >>She has done nothing that I can see to prove or disprove the >>phenomenon. And of course she relates to Jacobson's skewed book. >>I'd be surprised if she didn't. You do so (or say you do so) >>because the book is inane, full of the kind of garbage one would >>expect to see from the fringe element - KK included - who drift >>around on the backwaters of UFO the research community; looking >>for the crumbs left behind by studious researchers. >>One need only look at Jaconson's treatment of the technology re >>Lockhheed for instance, it is pathetic. No real research done >>there at all. And of course Jacobson has been disputed by the >>very people that she claims to have interviewed. Watching her >>sputter and attempt to support her claims on Night Line was >>pretty sad. Bascally she did not produce the goods, a problem KK >>has had herself on many occassions. Her ability to buy into >>absurdity - particularly this book - without a ounce of research >>of the source is astounding. >>But as I said, this is what you can expect from the fringe >>element. >Don: >Although you admit to not knowing who I am and what I am about, >you lodge an attack that is unwarranted. And, why, because >Jacobsen wrote a book, got interviewed in most major news >sources and I supported her efforts. I even suggested that the >Tale of Roswell was up for grabs because there is no evidence >proving anything conclusive. It is why there are countless books >written about an event that happened in 1947. <snip> Kathy: By supporting the insane tale of Jacobsen on Roswell, you just confirm what I think of you. My global opinion is that debunking, conscious or unconscious, is alive and well in the medias, especially on the web. That remark applies as well to the flood of pictures, obviously faked, of alleged nazi flying saucers. I repeat what I just said in another post, for the Haunebu: where are they? Nobody has seen one. Cheers Gildas Bourdais Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp