From: Kathy Kasten <catraja.nul> Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 20:15:19 +0000 Archived: Sat, 23 Jul 2011 07:02:05 -0400 Subject: Re: Devastating Critique Of Jacobsen's 'Area 51' >From: Kevin Randle <KRandle993.nul> >To: post.nul >Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 21:34:04 -0400 (EDT) >Subject: Re: Devastating Critique Of Jacobsen's 'Area 51' Book >>From: Kathy Kasten <catraja.nul> >>To: <post.nul> >>Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 17:40:43 +0000 >>Subject: Re: Devastating Critique Of Jacobsen's 'Area 51' Book ><snip> >Kathy, List, All - >>2) Report from Nick Redfern from "insider", as I remember it, >>from Oak Ridge Lab. In this case malformed children. >I have heard from Nick Redfern about this. He told me, "No, my >former Oak Ridge source made no mention of children. We can, of >course, muse upon whatever did or did not happen at Roswell for >ever and a day! But, there was definitely no mention of children >in the story as provided to me by the woman from Oak Ridge." <snip> >Had Kathy bothered to check her information, she could have >eliminated one of her points right away. Kevin: I merely repeat what I read. I quoted from three sources in print who promoted the idea of "deformed children." Did Redfern post or print an update of his theory based on the Oak Ridge insider? Are you claiming a conversation with Nick Redfern where he disclosed this information? And, if so, where did you share the topic of that conversation. As for repeating a rumor from a local Roswell resident, born and raised in Roswell, you would know better than anybody the validity and credibility of local gossip in the town of Roswell. Especially among people with an intense interest in promoting their town and economy. Anything else I have said about possible basis for the small stature of pilots rumored to have been found among the crash debris comes from people not connected with ufos nor do they have any interested in ufos. However, the researchers I have read do want to set the historical record straight. As your response shows, nobody in the ufo community is interested in quotes not from the list of approved ufo authors. In my estimation it is the reason Roswell continues to perplex and elude a solution. However, I am satisfied with my own research and am thankful it doesn't have any connection to the usual suspects. As always, Kevin, I appreciate your input. However, I think your criticism is not justified as you are one of the people who did field research in Roswell. I noticed that you did not discount John Price's report of the "deformed child" rumor. Does that mean you did not interact with Price or use him as a source of contacts in your field research? If you claim that, I will have to refute your response. We don't need to go to that place, do we? KK Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp