From: Don Ledger <dledger.nul> Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 15:19:56 -0300 Archived: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 15:47:04 -0400 Subject: Re: Devastating Critique Of Jacobsen's 'Area 51' >From: Robert Powell <rpowell.nul> >To: post.nul >Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 07:33:39 -0500 >Subject: Re: Devastating Critique Of Jacobsen's 'Area 51' Book >>From: Kathy Kasten<catraja.nul> >>To:<post.nul> >>Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 17:40:43 +0000 >>Subject: Re: Devastating Critique Of Jacobsen's 'Area 51' Book >>I would like to point out that the only comment regarding >>Jacobsen's take on Roswell was made by Stanton Friedman. >>Something to the effect that "it was rubbish". >>No one else has commented except with a flip of the palm and 'oh >>well what do you expect she's not one of us'. No, but her >>report, to my mind, is the third one discussing "deformed >>children" or similar tale regarding the pilots - i.e., the >>bodies found at the "crash site." ><snip> >Kathy, re-read the posts. There have been plenty of comments as >to why Jacobsen's theory is "rubbish". I am not a proponent of >the flying saucer theory for Roswell, but Jacobsen's theory is >not even plausible. Jacobsen's scenario is not even a decent theory. As you say, Robert, rubbish. Absurd might be a better word. I don't know what happened in Roswell but this is another attempt to use a razor blade to trim the edges of the puzzle pieces to make them fit. It is amazing the stuff that the fringe element will buy into. Don Ledger Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp