From: Robert Powell <rpowell.nul> Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 07:33:39 -0500 Archived: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 10:37:53 -0400 Subject: Re: Devastating Critique Of Jacobsen's 'Area 51' >From: Kathy Kasten<catraja.nul> >To:<post.nul> >Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 17:40:43 +0000 >Subject: Re: Devastating Critique Of Jacobsen's 'Area 51' Book >I would like to point out that the only comment regarding >Jacobsen's take on Roswell was made by Stanton Friedman. >Something to the effect that "it was rubbish". >No one else has commented except with a flip of the palm and 'oh >well what do you expect she's not one of us'. No, but her >report, to my mind, is the third one discussing "deformed >children" or similar tale regarding the pilots - i.e., the >bodies found at the "crash site." <snip> Kathy, re-read the posts. There have been plenty of comments as to why Jacobsen's theory is "rubbish". I am not a proponent of the flying saucer theory for Roswell, but Jacobsen's theory is not even plausible. Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp