From: Joshua Laudermilk <joshua.laudermilk.nul> Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2011 19:37:57 -0400 Archived: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 06:54:43 -0400 Subject: Re: Devastating Critique Of Jacobsen's 'Area 51' >From: Don Ledger <dledger.nul >To: post.nul >Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2011 15:01:05 -0300 >Subject: Re: Devastating Critique Of Jacobsen's 'Area 51' Book >From ridiculous claims for the name Area 51 being >derived from the beginning of operations in 1951 These kind of claims make me think that many people didn't even read the book. The book does not claim that Area 51 was founded in 1951, it claims that a facility called S-4 (Sigma-4) was founded in 1951, five miles north of what would eventually become Area 12 & Area 15. Ms. Jacobsen makes it very clear that the reason Area 51's existence is covered up is not because of the development of secret aircraft there, but because of S-4, which was operational at least into the 1980s and as I believe, continues to operate to this day. I don't know why my previous message wasn't sent through, but I was trying to write that the article is totally crap in regard to its critique of Jacobsen's view of Roswell. The Roswell Incident was not the result of Project Mogul, Brad Sparks has proven that the Project Mogule cover was a lie and that the flight path didn't go anywhere remotely near the site of the alleged recovered craft and bodies. Sincerely, Josh Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp