From: Stanton T. Friedman <fsphys.nul> Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2011 13:19:22 -0300 Archived: Sat, 16 Jul 2011 16:14:53 -0400 Subject: Re: Devastating Critique Of Jacobsen's 'Area 51' >From: Rich Heiden <rwheidenu.nul> >To: post.nul >Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 12:58:59 -0700 (PDT) >Subject: Devastating Critique Of Jacobsen's 'Area 51' Book >Devastating critique of Annie Jacobsen's Area 51 book, by >Robert S. Norris and Jeffrey T. Richelson: >http://www.washingtondecoded.com/site/2011/07/area51.html#more >I thank John Coster-Mullen, an atom-bomb researcher and writer, >for calling this to my attention. I agree with their comments about Annie, But must point out theat there are many similar biases and errors in their review. No seriously researched book about Roswell is even mentioned. They get their basic information wrong... dates etc. And yet they complain about all the scurces Annie didn't consult. The pot is calling the kettle black. I did send a comment. Calling me a conspiracy theoriet and not mentioning books, professional background and then not doing their own homework is rather ludicrous. Stan Friedman Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp