From: Steve Sawyer <stevesaw.nul> Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2011 07:56:54 -0700 Archived: Tue, 05 Jul 2011 12:28:19 -0400 Subject: Re: Annie Jacobsen's Roswell Source Cracked? >From: Giuliano Marinkovic <giuliano.marinkovic.nul> >To: <post.nul> >Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2011 13:52:59 +0200 >Subject: Annie Jacobsen's Roswell Source Cracked? >Annie Jacobsen's Roswell source allegedly cracked: >The Bragalia Files >http://tinyurl.com/3tw7w87 >Friday, May 27, 2011 >Area 51 Book Exposed: Source For Roswell Story Named And Interviewed! >by Anthony Bragalia >During Annie's Coast to Coast interview on May 29th 2011, George >Knapp asked her directly about Bragalia's article but Annie >didn't want to comment the story. >Giuliano What I find most remarkable in the controversy Annie Jacobsen's 'Area 51' book has stirred up is not the astounding number of basic factual errors she made in writing her book, nor the issue of whether her single source, retired E.G.& G. engineer Alfred O'Donnell, was deluded into believing the fabulous Stalin/Mengele disinformational back story he was provided in 1951 (presumably a US government hoax fabricated for the most likely purpose of testing O'Donnell, and others, ability to maintain security when exposed to a deliberately and intentionally provocative fake scenario before being read into later, genuine black projects), but the quite intriguing fact that, if his basic story is true, that elements of the US government's military and intelligence communities would, within only four years after the Roswell incident (and whatever it may have actually been), be using the UFO and ET themes as a means to both test security consciousness, surface hostile agents, and to utilize same in a manner which strongly suggests a form of domestic intelligence psyop replete with self-denying disinfo elements which, even if exposed, or simply rumored within such circles, readily functioned as the basis for and means to exploit and simultaneously plausibly deny the genuine basis for those aspects of the UFO phenomenon which actually do suggest a reasonable foundation for evidence of some form of advanced non- human intelligence periodically making its presence known in select cases, such as the 1957 RB-47 incident or the 1976 Iranian F-4B encounter, among many others. These kind of disinfo ploys or security-testing ruses, using faked UFOs and/or "non-human" entities, would suggest they were successfully used more than once domestically, such as in the scenario Nick Redfern describes in his "Body Snatchers in the Desert" book, wherein two anonymous sources describe very similar scenarios being used for presumably similar counter- intelligence (CI) purposes. Kind of makes one wonder just how and why these CI ploys originated, and how often they have been used since, over time. The psyop conducted on Paul Bennewitz comes to mind, and begs the question of the ethics and legality of such CI "games" being domestically used on civilians, including UFO researchers, over the intervening decades, and on others for military and intell purposes for a wide variety of reasons. There are a number of other cases where such hoaxed scenarios have been used. Kind of a "Swiss Army Knife" of many disinfo/psyop "tools," or "sources and methods," that both provide cover for real black ops and projects, further muddy the waters of ufology, and create a swarming school of red herrings for those so deliberately exposed to such distracting and diversionary techniques to pursue in a falsely enigmatic and fruitless wild goose chase, like a magiian's slight of hand. The repercussions within society and to history and belief when these stories do finally surface are manifold and disturbing. What concerns me is the subtle long-term sociological and societal impact and manipulative "black propaganda" effects such hoaxed fabrications have on ufology, and societal belief systems in general, which I think are both unhealthy and quite possibly damaging to the body politic and our right to know the truth about our government's policies (and how the use of such misbegotten and deleterious practices has a disruptive, undermining effect on the authority and trust in the institutions of government), and I think such techniques and methods, especially when employed domestically on US citizens and civilans, should be thoroughly investigated, exposed, and made illegal due to their potential negative effects and impact on society and the right to know in a democratic republic. What do others here think of the morals, ethics, and legality of the use of such practices by elements of the government? Shoud they be the subject of Congressional investigation and legislation to legally ban such, essentially, negative and destructive domestic disinformational manipulation or psyops? To me, it smacks of the manipulation and propagandizing efforts of the USAF and CIA-sponsored Robertson Panel and the policies they recommended be used to suppress and divert genuine interest in and research concerning the actual UFO phenomenon. It disgusts me that elements of the US government can so eaily and blithely get away with secretly distorting, covering up, and lying to the American electorate about such a seriously important subject of real scientific and societal interest and significance for the last 65 years. Steve Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp