From: Kathy Kasten <catraja.nul> Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 17:43:27 +0000 Archived: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 06:52:21 -0500 Subject: Re: Alien Abduction - What's Left? >From: Steven Kaeser <steve.nul> >To: <post.nul> >Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 15:28:06 -0500 >Subject: Re: Alien Abduction - What's Left? >>From: Rick Nielsen <nilthchi.nul> >>To: UFOUpDates <post.nul> >>Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 19:23:34 -0800 (PST) >>Subject: Alien Abduction - What's Left? >>The following is not rigorous science. It's not even science; >>just some topics for possible further discussion. >>After Jacobs and Hopkins, what do we have left? >>We have everything else that wasn't obtained with lacking >>ethics, or hypnotic regression, including: ><snip> >I'd suggest reading "Alien Discussions", which is a collection >of the papers submitted to the 1992 Abduction Conference held at >M.I.T. >I think it's a mistake to believe that the scientific foundation >of this area of study was solely based on the research of Jacobs >and Hopkins. Rick: As Steven points out Jacobs and Hopkins are not the only two people interacting with individuals claiming ET abduction. They are the only people who promoted themselves at ufo conferences and with books aimed at sales within the ufo community. The list of people whom I have read is too long to post here. Although a sampling is presented just recently in a few posts to the List. KK Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp