From: Gene Steinberg <gene.nul> Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 07:49:03 -0700 Archived: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 06:26:50 -0500 Subject: Re: Woods/Jacobs - A Salient But Missing Point >From: Alfred Lehmberg <alienview.nul> >To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <post.nul> >Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 14:15:42 -0600 >Subject: Re: Woods/Jacobs - A Salient But Missing Point <snip> This is the last time I will respond. You aren't worth the time, and you have nothing valid to contribute to this discussion nor, it seems, to any discussion that involves adults talking to each other using logic and reason. For those of you who are exhausted from coping with Lehmberg's verbal morass to find a semblance of fact within the mud- slinging, this is where I stand on this situation: 1. 'Emma Woods' is a deceiver. She posted messages supporting herself in our forums (and elsewhere I understand) under a fake name, other than the fake name she is already using. Wearing the mask of anonymity, she has turned herself into a celebrity of sorts as the alleged abused victim, with a Web site, thousands of e-mails, message board posts, magazine articles, and radio appearances. Before that happened the woman who calls herself 'Emma Woods' didn't exist in the world at large. None of this means that she wasn't somehow mistreated by someone who lives thousands of miles away, someone she's never met, and only communicated with by phone, email, or Internet chats. As I said, she appears smart enough to know that you can end a conversation by hanging up the phone, and you can stop communicating in writing by not putting her fingers on the keyboard,or holding a pen or pencil in your hand. Was she somehow mentally abused by Jacobs? That's for mental health professionals or the courts to determine, and so far, the authorities she's contacted have given her complaints a huge thumbs down. 2. I do not support the conclusions expressed by Jacobs about alien hybrids. As I wrote elsewhere, I am not persuaded by the value of hypnotic regression to recover lost memories of possible missing time events (though I suppose it's useful as an instigative tool with proper controls), and I certainly worry about attempting to hypnotize someone by phone, since you cannot observe physical reactions. I also feel that Jacobs should have avoided the 'Woods' issue altogether, and I have concerns about the therapist in New Zealand who suggested in the first place that she seek help from laymen abduction researchers in the U.S. Now can we actually get back to UFO research for a change rather than this maddening soap opera? Peace, Gene Steinberg Host/Executive Producer, The Paracast www.theparacast.com Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp