UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2011 > Feb > Feb 26

Re: Woods/Jacobs - A Salient But Missing Point

From: Emma Woods <e.woods33.nul>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 20:55:47 -0800 (PST)
Archived: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 07:37:58 -0500
Subject: Re: Woods/Jacobs - A Salient But Missing Point


>From: Gene Steinberg <gene.nul>
>To: post.nul
>Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 06:32:23 -0700
>Subject: Re: Woods/Jacobs - A Salient But Missing Point

>>From: Alfred Lehmberg <alienview.nul>
>>To: <post.nul>
>>Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 15:44:34 -0600
>>Subject: Re: Woods/Jacobs - A Salient But Missing Point

>>Which is apropos only of the projectile expulsion to which
>>you have already alluded, Mr. Steinberg, and not the three
>>disparate digital sound experts I've consulted about the
>>genuineness of the Emma Woods recordings. All of _them_,
>>sans a dog in the hunt I might add, give the audio reviewed
>>a clean Bill of health.

>>Checkmate.

>What you say there means nothing. Yes, I'm sure the
>recordings are real in the sense that you are hearing the
>actual voices of 'Woods' and Jacobs. But you do not
>know how they were manipulated, what was left on the
>virtual cutting room floor, and that's something your
>alleged 'disparate digital sound experts' could not
>possibly determine. You are hearing excerpts; all of the
>recordings haven't been posted. What's more, even those
>excerpts are edited by 'Woods' (as she herself admits) to
>remove personal information. You have to take her word
>that she didn't eliminate other elements that would reverse
>the meaning of what you do hear.

>Clean bill of health?

>There's also the question of context. 'Woods' may say an
>excerpt relates to A, whereas Jacobs may say they actually
>relate to B. How do you know? You weren't there? Your
>'disparate digital sound experts' weren't there either.

I am the person who has tried to have Dr. Jacobs work with me as
a research subject investigated, which would obviously
necessitate having the full recordings of the hypnosis sessions
analyzed. In addition, Dr. Jacobs recorded all the hypnosis
sessions himself, and he therefore has the full recordings.

I would never be so stupid as to '=9Cmanipulate', or misrepresent
in any way, the contents of my hypnosis sessions, knowing that
Dr. Jacobs has the full recordings himself, and that any
investigation of my complaints, which I myself have been pushing
for, would immediately expose that.

In 2009 I filed a complaint with the U.S. Department of Health
& Human Services=E2=80=99 Office for Human Research Protections
(OHRP) about Temple University=E2=80=99s failure, in my opinion, to
adequately investigate Dr. Jacobs' misconduct.

In my written complaint, I transcribed extracts from my first
twenty hypnosis sessions. Together with my written complaint, I
provided the OHRP with the full recordings of those hypnosis
sessions, with names and potentially identifying material
redacted, in order that the OHRP could confirm that the
transcriptions were accurate, and that the extracts were in
context.




Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast

At:

http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/

These contents above are copyright of the author and
UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced
without the express permission of both parties and
are intended for educational use only.

[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp


Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com