From: Martin Shough <parcellular.nul> Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 15:23:01 -0000 Archived: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 10:47:31 -0500 Subject: Re: Minot AFB Case >From: Roy Hale <roy.nul> >To: <post.nul> >Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 14:22:57 -0000 >Subject: Re: Minot AFB Case [was: McGonagle's Ufological Stand] >>From: Martin Shough <parcellular.nul> >>To: <post.nul> >>Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 13:21:54 -0000 >>Subject: Minot AFB Case [was: McGonagle's Ufological Stand] ><snip> >>Ah, so there was no mistake. You _do_ regard the case as a proof >>of ET. At this point I would like to have been able to say, "OK, >>then, let's get one with it - now you can answer my question and >>we can have that discussion." But frankly your response, even >>now, is so empty and utterly pathetic that I see no hope of any >>kind of fruitful examination of the question with you. It's my >>fault. I should have known better. >Martin, >Would you say that after all your years of dedicated writing on >this subject and investigative research that there has been one >case in the world whereupon you could apply ET coming to this >planet as an answer? Hi Roy FWIW, there are quite a few cases where I could say that an ET- analogue is a possible answer. There are some where I would say it is even a tempting possibility. But I don't personally know of one where I feel forced to say that the probability of any other explanation is negligible in comparison. I certainly don't know of any case where I would say that to continue looking for any possible explanation other than ET is risible or contemptible. What about you? Regards, Martin Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp