From: Alfred Lehmberg <alienview.nul> Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 08:18:43 -0600 Archived: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 10:07:50 -0500 Subject: Re: Woods/Jacobs - A Salient But Missing Point >From: Gene Steinberg <gene.nul> >To: post.nul >Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 10:18:43 -0700 >Subject: Re: Woods/Jacobs - A Salient But Missing Point >>From: David Cherniack <davidc.nul> >>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <post.nul> >>Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:46:57 -0500 >>Subject: Woods/Jacobs - A Salient But Missing Point ><snip> We'll forget for a moment that it may be logical: one person subordinated under the hypnotic suggestibility of another may not be capable of an informed consent regarding the deliberate insertion, from the latter into the former, of a wild-card pathology for _any_ reason, eh? Too, not a medical doctor, Doctor Jacobs may be free of any responsibility to do no harm, in pursuit of a legacy treating persons as a means to an end and not wounded and suffering human beings in his charge. >>On the other hand he has released nothing yet to support his >>counter claim. His lack of action may be for a number of >>reasons. from ethical to technical to legal but it shouldn't be >>assumed that it's because he's guilty of manipulating 'Emma >>Woods' without her knowledge. >Actually, he has, although it's quite brief: >http://www.ufoabduction.com/defamationcampaign.htm _Quite_ brief, and to put it _kindly_, morphing slightly into other, more evolved, incarnations of same when confronted with the pesky facts. Have no fear, Mr. Steinberg, I'm sure he'll get it right eventually. >He says he's working on a far more extensive response, where he >will actually comment on the recordings and other issues. With others, I _eagerly_ anticipate same, you know, on the recordings and the other issues. >Also, >since the recordings were evidently made by Emma and not >Jacobs, only she has access to the full unedited versions. Which seems to be a very slick and plausibly deniable way to imply that the unedited versions are suspect, eh, Mr. Steinberg? Seems pretty duplicitous if that is the mechanism employed. Was that the mechanism employed? I offer that it was. >And, despite a few unfounded rumors, I am not necessarily taking >sides in this issue. Sir! I'm provoked to squirty giggles when I'm not looking down at my plate in astonished embarrassment and stunned incredulity! What a laughable _presumption_ you so pompously prosecute: that a person with no dog in the hunt can't _readily_ observe that you, at your moderately popular _Paracast_ message board, will quickly shut down the pro-Emma discussion to celebrate the anti- Emma rant! You've very _clearly_ taken sides, Sir! Early, undeniably, without doubt, and to this day! >I'm only suggesting folks look at both >sides before reaching conclusions. Gonna have to throw down the yellow flag on that, too, Mr. Steinberg, as something less than an accurate portrayal of your attitude, action, and activity. See, to date imo, you have done naught but marginalize Emma Woods. You have provided a ready platform for the unceasing insult and humiliation of Emma Woods. Moreover, you have clearly allied yourself with the substantial forces opposed to Emma Woods and been the stealthy mouthpiece for their discursive spin on the history of same, all along. Too, you seem to stand foursquare behind this new idea or toxic meme, IMO, that its OK to mind-rape, even psycho-sexually abuse or intellectually assault another if, otherwise, you're a 'great guy', 'huge in the community', and/or have a world-class reputation. Hmmm... on second thought, I guess that's _not_ such a new idea. Mr. Steinberg, you're a black cat licking blood from jet paws and coughing up canary feathers. Decidedly, the presumption that you fairly center this issue is laughable where it is not just outrageous. With Dr. Jacobs then, you can stand-down, step-off, and walk away as an embarrassing 'in-the-tank' irrelevancy, too. The field would be well served, nes't ce pas? alienview.nul www.AlienView.net AVG Blog -- http://alienviewgroup.blogspot.com/ U F O M a g a z i n e -- www.ufomag.com Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp