UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2011 > Feb > Feb 23

Re: Woods/Jacobs - A Salient But Missing Point

From: Alfred Lehmberg <alienview.nul>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 08:18:43 -0600
Archived: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 10:07:50 -0500
Subject: Re: Woods/Jacobs - A Salient But Missing Point


>From: Gene Steinberg <gene.nul>
>To: post.nul
>Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 10:18:43 -0700
>Subject: Re: Woods/Jacobs - A Salient But Missing Point

>>From: David Cherniack <davidc.nul>
>>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <post.nul>
>>Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:46:57 -0500
>>Subject: Woods/Jacobs - A Salient But Missing Point

><snip>

We'll forget for a moment that it may be logical: one person
subordinated under the hypnotic suggestibility of another may
not be capable of an informed consent regarding the deliberate
insertion, from the latter into the former, of a wild-card
pathology for _any_ reason, eh?

Too, not a medical doctor, Doctor Jacobs may be free of any
responsibility to do no harm, in pursuit of a legacy treating
persons as a means to an end and not wounded and suffering human
beings in his charge.

>>On the other hand he has released nothing yet to support his
>>counter claim. His lack of action may be for a number of
>>reasons. from ethical to technical to legal but it shouldn't be
>>assumed that it's because he's guilty of manipulating 'Emma
>>Woods' without her knowledge.

>Actually, he has, although it's quite brief:

>http://www.ufoabduction.com/defamationcampaign.htm

_Quite_ brief, and to put it _kindly_, morphing slightly into
other, more evolved, incarnations of same when confronted with
the pesky facts. Have no fear, Mr. Steinberg, I'm sure he'll get
it right eventually.

>He says he's working on a far more extensive response, where he
>will actually comment on the recordings and other issues.

With others, I _eagerly_ anticipate same, you know, on the
recordings and the other issues.

>Also,
>since the recordings were evidently made by Emma and not
>Jacobs, only she has access to the full unedited versions.

Which seems to be a very slick and plausibly deniable way to
imply that the unedited versions are suspect, eh, Mr.
Steinberg? Seems pretty duplicitous if that is the mechanism
employed. Was that the mechanism employed? I offer that it was.

>And, despite a few unfounded rumors, I am not necessarily taking
>sides in this issue.

Sir! I'm provoked to squirty giggles when I'm not looking down
at my plate in astonished embarrassment and stunned incredulity!
What a laughable _presumption_ you so pompously prosecute: that
a person with no dog in the hunt can't _readily_ observe that
you, at your moderately popular _Paracast_ message board, will
quickly shut down the pro-Emma discussion to celebrate the anti-
Emma rant! You've very _clearly_ taken sides, Sir! Early,
undeniably, without doubt, and to this day!

>I'm only suggesting folks look at both
>sides before reaching conclusions.

Gonna have to throw down the yellow flag on that, too, Mr.
Steinberg, as something less than an accurate portrayal of your
attitude, action, and activity. See, to date imo, you have done
naught but marginalize Emma Woods. You have provided a ready
platform for the unceasing insult and humiliation of Emma
Woods. Moreover, you have clearly allied yourself with the
substantial forces opposed to Emma Woods and been the stealthy
mouthpiece for their discursive spin on the history of same, all
along.

Too, you seem to stand foursquare behind this new idea or toxic
meme, IMO, that its OK to mind-rape, even psycho-sexually abuse
or intellectually assault another if, otherwise, you're a 'great
guy', 'huge in the community', and/or have a world-class
reputation. Hmmm... on second thought, I guess that's _not_ such
a new idea.

Mr. Steinberg, you're a black cat licking blood from jet paws
and coughing up canary feathers. Decidedly, the presumption that
you fairly center this issue is laughable where it is not just
outrageous. With Dr. Jacobs then, you can stand-down, step-off,
and walk away as an embarrassing 'in-the-tank' irrelevancy, too.

The field would be well served, nes't ce pas?


alienview.nul
www.AlienView.net
AVG Blog -- http://alienviewgroup.blogspot.com/
U F O M a g a z i n e -- www.ufomag.com


Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast

At:

http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/

These contents above are copyright of the author and
UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced
without the express permission of both parties and
are intended for educational use only.

[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp


Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com