From: Gildas Bourdais <bourdais.gildas.nul> Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 16:11:17 +0100 Archived: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 08:18:10 -0500 Subject: Re: Budd Hopkins >From: Alfred Lehmberg <alienview.nul> >To: <post.nul> >Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 10:22:08 -0600 >Subject: Re: Budd Hopkins >>From: Gildas Bourdais <bourdais.gildas.nul> >>To: <post.nul> >>Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 12:16:14 +0100 >>Subject: Re: Budd Hopkins <snip> >>>>>Budd Hopkins stands foursquare behind David Jacobs' _entirely_ >>>>>suspect, _baldly_ suspicious and _serially_ salacious ...where >>>>>the forthcoming are not mean, misogynistic, and utterly >>>>>mendacious, mind you... methods, practices, and activities. >>>>>Foursquare! >>>>Mr Lehmberg: >>>>It matters a lot to me. It is plainly wrong to say that Budd >>>>Hopkins entirely agrees with David Jacobs. I know that. >>>Sir! All respect! That is _immaterial_! Budd Hopkins stands >>>foursquare behind the conduct and activity of David Jacobs as >>>regards the Emma Woods affair! Ulterior, exterior, or peripheral >>>disagreements between the two are not, and have never been, the >>>issue! Mr Lehmberg, I was saying, as everybody could read, that Budd Hophins does not follow his friend David Jacobs's scenario of dramatic takeover of mankind by aliens. That is not "immaterial"! It is plainly true, contrary to what Carol Rainey has written on this List. People may be good friends and have differing viewpoints, even on important questions. But I see that you don't want to discuss that, and prefer to focus on the Wood case. Let's do that, and go directly to what looks more and more to me as a crucial question in that case. To make it short, David Jacobs was threatened in a message allegedly sent to him by a "hybrid". He believed it, and he was scared. He told that to Emma on the phone, she recorded it, and now it is one of the most dramatic pieces in her montage (yes, montage, like in a film, after the shooting), where he expresses real, deep anxiety (with indecent sneers of the two commentators on the sound track). Then he made a big mistake, as he has admitted himself, of inventing a false story to try to defuse that menace. All recorded by Emma, of course. I asked the question of who sent that damning message to him, and you suggest that he did it himself. In other words, he would have shot himself in the back! This is just absurd. So, the question remains: who sent that incredible message to him? This not a peripheral question. Mr. Lehmberg, you are leading me to suspect more and more that David Jacobs was, indeed, the victim of a well designed, tricky and wicked plot, to discredit him. I am not completely convinced yet, I would like to know more, but if you send another couple of messages with such poor arguments, perhaps I will be. Gildas Bourdais Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp