From: Rick Nielsen <nilthchi.nul> Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 09:59:49 -0800 (PST) Archived: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 14:08:13 -0500 Subject: Re: Budd Hopkins >From: Kevin Randle <KRandle993.nul> >To: post.nul >Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 14:18:08 EST >Subject: Re: Budd Hopkins >List, All >I was disturbed by the tone of Budd Hopkins' response to his >former wife. It struck me as more of a personal attack rather >than a reasoned, scientific discussion. I have posted, to my >blog, www.KevinRandle.blogspot.com, a long rebuttal of Budd's >response. >I will also note I was surprised by Budd's characterization of >Walter Webb. I have only communicated with him through email, >but found him to be a delightful individual. We share a common >interest in the China-Burma-India Theater of WWII. >These are just a couple of things that I thought should be >mentioned. >Kevin I wanted to say thank you Kevin. I read your blog article, and I agree with you: "What all this tells me is that after a decade and a half, others are beginning to raise the issues that Estes, Cone and I did in The Abduction Enigma. I think it=E2=80=99s about time, and I sincerely hope that the discussion can stay on a level of reviewing the evidence, or lack thereof, rather than descending into the cult of personality as it too often does. We have a chance here. Let=E2=80=99s not let it get away. Again." You may remember that my first question to this List a few years ago was 'where is all the evidence of alien abduction?' You may also remember the negative responses I received then. It's my hope too that the present discussion can remain a review of real results, rather than a return to personality attacks, adding to that more than a mere thought about rescuing the "abductees". Kevin, again thanks!
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp