UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2011 > Feb > Feb 18

Re: McGonagle's Ufological Stand

From: Carol Rainey <csrainey2.nul>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 10:23:09 -0500
Archived: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 10:35:52 -0500
Subject: Re: McGonagle's Ufological Stand

>From: Gildas Bourdais <bourdais.gildas.nul>
>To: <post.nul>
>Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 11:02:27 +0100
>Subject: Re: McGonagle's Ufological Stand

>>From: Joe McGonagle <joe.mcgonagle.nul>
>>To: post.nul
>>Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 14:54:58 +0000
>>Subject: Re: McGonagle's Ufological Stand

>>>From: Gildas Bourdais <bourdais.gildas.nul>
>>>To: <post.nul>
>>>Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 12:01:42 +0100
>>>Subject: Re: McGonagle's Ufological Stand


>>>Would you say that for the big, glowing UFO which hovered at
>>>night above missile silos of Minot AFB, on October 1968 and for
>>>which researchers found some twenty very credible witnesses?


>>I don't have the time to run through a series of reports and
>>offering an opinion on them, especially when I will have little
>>knowledge and even less interest in many of them.

>>I did mean Meteorological by 'Met', and I stand by what I said -
>>the majority of unexplained cases can most probably be
>>attributed to Met Phenomena of one kind or another. Your opinion
>>may be different, but I doubt that it would hold any more or
>.less value than mine.


>What you show here is sheer contempt for a major case.

>It tells me enough to qualify you as an almost perfect skeptic
>(or sceptic if you prefer).


>Gildas Bourdais

Actually, Mr. Bourdais, I didn't get a whiff of "contempt" from
the level, factual tone of Mr. McGonagle's re- sponse to you.

It is you who show contempt for anyone else's right to
have an opinion that differs from yours. Yet your opinion
is no more provable than his. This is a faith-based belief
you adhere to, one that seems to demand disrespect for other
people's choices--their often thoughtful, sometimes
extremely painful and difficult choices they may have
made about which events meet their own personal
standards for believability.

On this List, you seem to prefer to set up straw men and bait
people into a response just so that you can say: Aha! You _are_
an infidel! I was right!

There is a whiff of something here, though - a whiff of the
school bully. Come on. That's hardly interesting in an adult

Carol Rainey

Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast



These contents above are copyright of the author and
UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced
without the express permission of both parties and
are intended for educational use only.

[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp

Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com