From: Gildas Bourdais <bourdais.gildas.nul> Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 11:02:27 +0100 Archived: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 07:20:40 -0500 Subject: Re: McGonagle's Ufological Stand >From: Joe McGonagle <joe.mcgonagle.nul> >To: post.nul >Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 14:54:58 +0000 >Subject: Re: McGonagle's Ufological Stand >>From: Gildas Bourdais <bourdais.gildas.nul> >>To: <post.nul> >>Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 12:01:42 +0100 >>Subject: Re: McGonagle's Ufological Stand ><snip> >>Would you say that for the big, glowing UFO which hovered at >>night above missile silos of Minot AFB, on October 1968 and for >>which researchers found some twenty very credible witnesses? >Gildas, >I don't have the time to run through a series of reports and >offering an opinion on them, especially when I will have little >knowledge and even less interest in many of them. >I did mean Meteorological by 'Met', and I stand by what I said - >the majority of unexplained cases can most probably be >attributed to Met Phenomena of one kind or another. Your opinion >may be different, but I doubt that it would hold any more or >less value than mine. Joe, What you show here is sheer contempt for a major case. It tells me enough to qualify you as an almost perfect skeptic (or sceptic if you prefer). Cheers Gildas Bourdais Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp