From: Gildas Bourdais <bourdais.gildas.nul> Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 11:01:45 +0100 Archived: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 07:19:14 -0500 Subject: Re: Budd Hopkins >From: Alfred Lehmberg <alienview.nul> >To: <post.nul> >Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 08:39:45 -0600 >Subject: Re: Budd Hopkins >>From: Gildas Bourdais <bourdais.gildas.nul> >>To: <post.nul> >>Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 11:18:44 +0100 >>Subject: Re: Budd Hopkins >>>From: Carol Rainey <csrainey2.nul> >>>To: post.nul >>>Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 13:56:23 -0500 >>>Subject: Re: Alien Abduction Research [Was "Budd Hopkins"] <snip> >>>I'd like to raise the question of what alien abduction >>>researchers can and should do to substantiate their claims. >><snip> >>>Simply stated, these abduction researchers claim they have >>>evidence that aliens from elsewhere are physically invading >>>Earth with an ongoing, vigorously implemented plan to alter the >>>genome of the entire human species. This will bring about an all >>>but invisible take-over of the human race and the planet. We are >>>powerless to stop them. >>Carol, >>You imply here that Budd Hopkins shares completely the views of >>David Jacobs about a dramatic take-over of the human species. They >>are good friends, but your statement is plainly false. Budd has >>departed many times from that publicly. ><snip> >Even true and presuming that it _is_ true, Sir, it just doesn't >matter. >Budd Hopkins stands foursquare behind David Jacobs' _entirely_ >suspect, _baldly_ suspicious and _serially_ salacious ...where >the forthcoming are not mean, misogynistic, and utterly >mendacious, mind you... methods, practices, and activities. >Foursquare! Mr Lehmberg: It matters a lot to me. It is plainly wrong to say that Budd Hopkins entirely agrees with David Jacobs. I know that. And I just want to tell you that I am shocked by your tone and voccabulary in this difficult discussion. Now, I don't have a real opinion about the problem of Dr Jacobs with Emma Woods, but I do have a few things to say. First, that I met David Jacobs several times and remember a very courteous, friendly, calm and decent man. The present accusations against him don't fit with that. Secondly, regarding legal aspect of the case, I ask again: is it legal to tape private conversations during one or two years and publish a montage selected to discredit the man? Could not she be sued for that? Gildas Bourdais Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp