From: Joe McGonagle <joe.mcgonagle.nul> Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 14:54:58 +0000 Archived: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 10:05:20 -0500 Subject: Re: McGonagle's Ufological Stand >From: Gildas Bourdais <bourdais.gildas.nul> >To: <post.nul> >Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 12:01:42 +0100 >Subject: Re: McGonagle's Ufological Stand <snip> >Would you say that for the big, glowing UFO which hovered at >night above missile silos of Minot AFB, on October 1968 and for >which researchers found some twenty very credible witnesses? Gildas, I don't have the time to run through a series of reports and offering an opinion on them, especially when I will have little knowledge and even less interest in many of them. I did mean Meteorological by 'Met', and I stand by what I said - the majority of unexplained cases can most probably be attributed to Met Phenomena of one kind or another. Your opinion may be different, but I doubt that it would hold any more or less value than mine. Joe Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp