UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2011 > Feb > Feb 17

Re: Budd Hopkins

From: Alfred Lehmberg <alienview.nul>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 08:39:45 -0600
Archived: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 10:04:10 -0500
Subject: Re: Budd Hopkins

>From: Gildas Bourdais <bourdais.gildas.nul>
>To: <post.nul>
>Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 11:18:44 +0100
>Subject: Re: Budd Hopkins

>>From: Carol Rainey <csrainey2.nul>
>>To: post.nul
>>Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 13:56:23 -0500
>>Subject: Re: Alien Abduction Research [Was "Budd Hopkins"]

>>>From: Gildas Bourdais <bourdais.gildas.nul>
>>>To: <post.nul>
>>>Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 11:29:55 +0100
>>>Subject: Re: Budd Hopkins

>>Hello, Listers,

>>I'd like to raise the question of what alien abduction
>>researchers can and should do to substantiate their claims.


>>Simply stated, these abduction researchers claim they have
>>evidence that aliens from elsewhere are physically invading
>>Earth with an ongoing, vigorously implemented plan to alter the
>>genome of the entire human species. This will bring about an all
>>but invisible take-over of the human race and the planet. We are
>>powerless to stop them.


>You imply here that Budd Hopkins shares completely the views of
>David Jacobs about a dramatic take-over of the human species. They
>are good friends, but your statement is plainly false. Budd has
>departed many times from that publicly.


Even true and presuming that it _is_ true, Sir, it just doesn't

Budd Hopkins stands foursquare behind David Jacobs' _entirely_
suspect, _baldly_ suspicious and _serially_ salacious ...where
the forthcoming are not mean, misogynistic, and utterly
mendacious, mind you... methods, practices, and activities.

Moreover, Budd Hopkins facilitates the seeming slander of a
person with grievances so richly documented, realized, and
reviewed that his fervid and ironically _energetic_ and ongoing
support begins to appear suspicious in its own right... almost
as if in defending David Jacobs he is only defending _himself_
in the end. This defense, given the evidence and a legitimate
review of same, is as incorrigible as it is inexplicable.
Jacobs might have stepped off at the start.

Ms Woods, and Ms Rainey for that matter, can hardly be faulted
for wanting redress for wrongs and grievances perceived. Lisbeth
Salander, by way of illustration, is hardly faulted for her
campaign against Nils Bjurman or Dr. Teleborian (Google it). One
recalls all the fallout, needlessly endured by even innocent
persons, as a result of the betrayal of Salander _as_ an
innocent. A similar betrayal of Rainey and Woods - by the select
self-interested in the case regarded - is just not that much of
a stretch.

AVG Blog -- http://alienviewgroup.blogspot.com/
U F O M a g a z i n e -- www.ufomag.com

Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast



These contents above are copyright of the author and
UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced
without the express permission of both parties and
are intended for educational use only.

[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp

Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com