From: Alfred Lehmberg <alienview.nul> Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 08:39:45 -0600 Archived: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 10:04:10 -0500 Subject: Re: Budd Hopkins >From: Gildas Bourdais <bourdais.gildas.nul> >To: <post.nul> >Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 11:18:44 +0100 >Subject: Re: Budd Hopkins >>From: Carol Rainey <csrainey2.nul> >>To: post.nul >>Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 13:56:23 -0500 >>Subject: Re: Alien Abduction Research [Was "Budd Hopkins"] >>>From: Gildas Bourdais <bourdais.gildas.nul> >>>To: <post.nul> >>>Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 11:29:55 +0100 >>>Subject: Re: Budd Hopkins >>Hello, Listers, >>I'd like to raise the question of what alien abduction >>researchers can and should do to substantiate their claims. ><snip> >>Simply stated, these abduction researchers claim they have >>evidence that aliens from elsewhere are physically invading >>Earth with an ongoing, vigorously implemented plan to alter the >>genome of the entire human species. This will bring about an all >>but invisible take-over of the human race and the planet. We are >>powerless to stop them. >Carol, >You imply here that Budd Hopkins shares completely the views of >David Jacobs about a dramatic take-over of the human species. They >are good friends, but your statement is plainly false. Budd has >departed many times from that publicly. <snip> Even true and presuming that it _is_ true, Sir, it just doesn't matter. Budd Hopkins stands foursquare behind David Jacobs' _entirely_ suspect, _baldly_ suspicious and _serially_ salacious ...where the forthcoming are not mean, misogynistic, and utterly mendacious, mind you... methods, practices, and activities. Foursquare! Moreover, Budd Hopkins facilitates the seeming slander of a person with grievances so richly documented, realized, and reviewed that his fervid and ironically _energetic_ and ongoing support begins to appear suspicious in its own right... almost as if in defending David Jacobs he is only defending _himself_ in the end. This defense, given the evidence and a legitimate review of same, is as incorrigible as it is inexplicable. Jacobs might have stepped off at the start. Ms Woods, and Ms Rainey for that matter, can hardly be faulted for wanting redress for wrongs and grievances perceived. Lisbeth Salander, by way of illustration, is hardly faulted for her campaign against Nils Bjurman or Dr. Teleborian (Google it). One recalls all the fallout, needlessly endured by even innocent persons, as a result of the betrayal of Salander _as_ an innocent. A similar betrayal of Rainey and Woods - by the select self-interested in the case regarded - is just not that much of a stretch. alienview.nul www.AlienView.net AVG Blog -- http://alienviewgroup.blogspot.com/ U F O M a g a z i n e -- www.ufomag.com Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp