From: Greg Paloma <fractalmaze.nul>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 18:49:58 -0700
Archived: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 08:43:27 -0500
Subject: Re: Acceleration And Disappearance


>From: Bruce Maccabee <brumac.nul>
>To: post.nul
>Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 21:15:09 -0500 (EST)
>Subject: Re: Acceleration And Disappearance

>>From: Ray Dickenson <r.dickenson.nul>
>>To: <post.nul>
>>Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 15:55:56 -0000
>>Subject: Acceleration And Disappearance

>>>From: Bruce Maccabee <brumac.nul>
>>>To: post.nul
>>>Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 22:18:43 -0500 (EST)
>>>Subject: Acceleration And Disappearance

>>>Speed is nice but Acceleration is 'where it's at'. Acceleration
>>>is what separates 'them' from the boys.

>>>See my improved article on acceleration:

>>>http://www.brumac.8k.com/Acceleration/ACCELERATION.htm

>>Hello Bruce

>>have you looked at the apparent huge accelerations shown by a
>>craft/object filmed by NASA in 1991? It stopped dead - from
>>moving at orbital speeds - then zoomed off at high speed in
>>nearly the opposite direction, I think any humans in a craft
>>doing that would've instantly been converted into raspberry jam
>>splattered on the bulkheads.

>>>From 1 min 45 secs into this NASA STS-48 clip

>>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IiDvkB_rG-Q

>>"UFO Footage - STS-48 - "Abrupt Turn" - Full Length Original"

>I was never convinced that it tudied it.
>If it were a real (large) craft, then the acceleration would
>have been tremendous.

Hello,

If you listen to the audio they were performing a thrust
maneuver. The ice crystals that were already floating were
jostled by the directed thrust, the shuttle undertook a rotation
in a different direction, or a combination of both occurred.
However, since the earth remained within static view it appears
the ice crystals were almost entirely affected by the
directional thrust jets.

The importance of acceleration from a analytical point of view
demonstrates that an object is under it's own power
(intelligently constructed) and has an internal energy source.
This is most persuasive if moving horizontally (not under
apparent free fall) and/or moving upward against gravity.
Especially convincing if in possession of a hyperbolic
trajectory.


Regards,

Greg Paloma


[Before this becomes another redundant discussion please
 read past posts at the UFO UpDates Archive:

 http://tinyurl.com/4kqggmg

 ebk]



Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast

At:

http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/

These contents above are copyright of the author and
UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced
without the express permission of both parties and
are intended for educational use only.