From: Joe McGonagle <joe.mcgonagle.nul> Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 13:23:37 +0000 Archived: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 08:31:56 -0500 Subject: Re: McGonagle's Ufological Stand >From: Michael Tarbell <mtarbell.nul> >To: post.nul >Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 10:29:44 -0700 >Subject: Re: McGonagle's Ufological Stand >>From: Joe McGonagle <joe.mcgonagle.nul> >>To: post.nul >>Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 12:54:07 +0000 >>Subject: McGonagle's Ufological Stand [was: Budd Hopkins] ><snip> >>Personally I do not exclude the ETH, but it is very very low on >>the probability scale, below the probability of time travellers, >>which is also very low on the scale. Those are my opinions, >>don't expect me to substantiate them. >Joe, >As you evidently have at least a rudimentary ranking of >hypotheses, with ETs and time travelers near the bottom, would >you care to identify any that you place near the top? No need to >substantiate them, just curious. In general I would place undocumented/undiscovered met phenomena at or near the top, but it would depend on the exact nature of the report as to what potential explanation might be the best fit. At the end of the day, if a definite cause can not be determined, it is an (often subjective) 'best guess', with some reports even defying a guess. Joe Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp