From: Michael Tarbell <mtarbell.nul> Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 10:29:44 -0700 Archived: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 07:02:45 -0500 Subject: Re: McGonagle's Ufological Stand >From: Joe McGonagle <joe.mcgonagle.nul> >To: post.nul >Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 12:54:07 +0000 >Subject: McGonagle's Ufological Stand [was: Budd Hopkins] <snip> >Personally I do not exclude the ETH, but it is very very low on >the probability scale, below the probability of time travellers, >which is also very low on the scale. Those are my opinions, >don't expect me to substantiate them. Joe, As you evidently have at least a rudimentary ranking of hypotheses, with ETs and time travelers near the bottom, would you care to identify any that you place near the top? No need to substantiate them, just curious. Let me be clear that I'm not referring to what you think can explain most UFO sightings. Let's proceed from the assumption that the vast majority are misidentifications, delusions, or hoaxes. My interest is in those cases, if you concede any such exist, that do not (apparently) admit any prosaic explanation. As a gesture of good faith, I submit that I place the ETH at or near the top of the heap. But I'm by no means married to it. Any fresh alternative(s) gladly considered. Regards Mike Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp