From: Alfred Lehmberg <alienview.nul> Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 17:10:29 -0600 Archived: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 18:26:08 -0500 Subject: Re: Question For A. J. Gevaerd On Trindade >From: Greg Paloma <fractalmaze.nul> >To: post.nul >Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 15:05:27 -0700 >Subject: Re: Question For A. J. Gevaerd On Trindade >>From: A. J. Gevaerd - Revista UFO <aj.nul> >>To: <post.nul> >>Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 13:47:44 -0200 >>Subject: Re: Question For A. J. Gevaerd On Trindade >>>From: Greg Paloma <fractalmaze.nul> >>>To: post.nul >>>Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 16:10:11 -0700 >>>Subject: Question For A. J. Gevaerd On Trindade >>>A Question for The Brazilian UFO Magazine: >>>What are the various published total duration intervals for the >>>Barauna UFO photo sequence? A quick list would be best along >>>with their publisher and published dates. Add any thoughts and >>>evolutionary reflections where needed. >>Hi Greg >>I frankly don't know the duration intervals for the Barauna UFO >>photo sequence. I believe they have already been published >>somewhere and there will be - I hope - a list of available >>publishers and publishing dates for the info on the Web. >>I am not sure of what you mean by "evolutionary reflections". >Hi A. J. >The case is old, new information becomes available over time... >things evolve... hope this explains my use of this term. >I believe my question was straightforward, fair, and open. I'm >allowing you much for the margins of inclusivity and your full >thoughts to emerge should you wish. >By your own admission, you are the defacto expert I presume? The >Brazillian UFO Magaine has been following the case for years, >correct? >Let me rephrase my question:. >Q1: What was the first reported time duration for the entire >Barauna photographic sequence? Surely, you can confirm >Barauna's testimony, and the first published account? >Q2: Also, has Barauna's total time estimates changed over time. >Did he stick to the original time calculation? If not what were >his later estimates? >I seek your answer to this since you are closest to the case in >language, one of it's champions, and experts. I'm asking you not >the Internet. Any question properly couched, Sir, is immanently askable, even if its premise is the first thing addressed; only, if you don't want to ask the INTERNET, you might reconsider asking on a public board. I've a question. I wonder, would you ever work as hard to credit a case as you seem to toil to discredit one? I seek your answer to this since you are closest to the case in opposition, one of it's anti-heroes, so to speak, and one of its experts, of a sort. I'm asking _you_, moreover, along with anyone else wishing to contribute to the merriment. alienview.nul www.AlienView.net AVG Blog -- http://alienviewgroup.blogspot.com/ U F O M a g a z i n e -- www.ufomag.com Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp