From: Martin Shough <parcellular.nul> Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 12:23:52 -0000 Archived: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 07:28:33 -0500 Subject: Re: More On The Trindade Island Case >From: Greg Paloma <fractalmaze.nul> >To: post.nul >Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 14:03:01 -0700 >Subject: Re: More On The Trindade Island Case >>From: Martin Shough <parcellular.nul> >>To: <post.nul> >>Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 13:06:19 -0000 >>Subject: Re: More On The Trindade Island Case >>>From: Greg Paloma <fractalmaze.nul> >>>To: post.nul >>>Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 16:56:09 -0700 >>>Subject: Re: More On The Trindade Island Case >>>>From: A. J. Gevaerd - Revista UFO <aj.nul> >>>>To: <post.nul> >>>>Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 08:48:03 -0200 >>>>Subject: More On The Trindade Island Case >>>>As I informed in my previous message, >>>>http://www.ufoupdateslist.com/2011/feb/m04-013.shtml >>>>we already have a complete version of the new information >>>>about >>>>the Trindade Island Case available to the International UFO >>>>Community in the website of the Brazilian UFO Magazine >>>>(www.ufo.com.br). ><snip> >>>Question for Brazilian UFO Magazine: <snip> >Mr Shough, >I much appreciate this reply but this should not also substitute >for the anticipated response I most desire from the case >champions closest to the event by language, length of study, >and assumed detail. >Many interconnecting factors underlie my question including the >linear relationship between event time and the number of >witnesses reported. This is also in direct correlation to the >cloud shift. >We should all agree that the greater the length of time of the >actual ufo sighting event, the greater the probability for more >witneses. Since we have only a few direct witnesses, we should >count that as favoring less time for the transpiration of the >event. >Your estimate is reasonable and in the interest of the >unavoidable and sought after consensus, I will assume you would >settle for a total time of 45 +/- 15 seconds. That is about 9 >+/- 3 seconds average between all six shots. Are we agreeed? Hi Greg Your arithmetic is correct, but I offered my comment in a spirit of helping you to callibrate the significance of answers to the question you posed to Brazilian UFO Magazine. I am not "settling for" anything, personally, and prefer that you don't assume anything. There are various figures in the literature, and different assumptions about what they signify and what their source is. It is one ambiguous detail among many. I reserve my right to adapt my judgments on them all without notice in the light of all those "interconnecting factors" that make the whole Trindade puzzle so complex and fascinating. I am an interested observer and await your argument when it comes. >Do the Brazillian researchers agree as well? Please do not induct me into any sort of "block vote" on this issue or any other. If "the Brazilian researchers" have a corporate position, then like you I will be interested to see what it is, and why, but I am not joining any campaign team or having any badges pinned on my lapel, thanks ;-) Martin Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp