UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2011 > Feb > Feb 11

Re: More On The Trindade Island Case

From: Martin Shough <parcellular.nul>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 12:23:52 -0000
Archived: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 07:28:33 -0500
Subject: Re: More On The Trindade Island Case

>From: Greg Paloma <fractalmaze.nul>
>To: post.nul
>Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 14:03:01 -0700
>Subject: Re: More On The Trindade Island Case

>>From: Martin Shough <parcellular.nul>
>>To: <post.nul>
>>Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 13:06:19 -0000
>>Subject: Re: More On The Trindade Island Case

>>>From: Greg Paloma <fractalmaze.nul>
>>>To: post.nul
>>>Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 16:56:09 -0700
>>>Subject: Re: More On The Trindade Island Case

>>>>From: A. J. Gevaerd - Revista UFO <aj.nul>
>>>>To: <post.nul>
>>>>Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 08:48:03 -0200
>>>>Subject: More On The Trindade Island Case

>>>>As I informed in my previous message,


>>>>we already have a complete version of the new information
>>>>the Trindade Island Case available to the International UFO
>>>>Community in the website of the Brazilian UFO Magazine


>>>Question for Brazilian UFO Magazine:


>Mr Shough,

>I much appreciate this reply but this should not also substitute
>for the anticipated response I most desire from the case
>champions closest to the event by language, length of study,
>and assumed detail.

>Many interconnecting factors underlie my question including the
>linear relationship between event time and the number of
>witnesses reported. This is also in direct correlation to the
>cloud shift.

>We should all agree that the greater the length of time of the
>actual ufo sighting event, the greater the probability for more
>witneses. Since we have only a few direct witnesses, we should
>count that as favoring less time for the transpiration of the

>Your estimate is reasonable and in the interest of the
>unavoidable and sought after consensus, I will assume you would
>settle for a total time of 45 +/- 15 seconds. That is about 9
>+/- 3 seconds average between all six shots. Are we agreeed?

Hi Greg

Your arithmetic is correct, but I offered my comment in a spirit
of helping you to callibrate the significance of answers to the
question you posed to Brazilian UFO Magazine. I am not "settling
for" anything, personally, and prefer that you don't assume
anything. There are various figures in the literature, and
different assumptions about what they signify and what their
source is. It is one ambiguous detail among many. I reserve my
right to adapt my judgments on them all without notice in the
light of all those "interconnecting factors" that make the whole
Trindade puzzle so complex and fascinating. I am an interested
observer and await your argument when it comes.

>Do the Brazillian researchers agree as well?

Please do not induct me into any sort of "block vote" on this
issue or any other. If "the Brazilian researchers" have a
corporate position, then like you I will be interested to see
what it is, and why, but I am not joining any campaign team or
having any badges pinned on my lapel, thanks ;-)


Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast



These contents above are copyright of the author and
UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced
without the express permission of both parties and
are intended for educational use only.

[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp

Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com