From: Jerome Clark <jkclark.nul> Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 14:28:37 -0600 Archived: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 16:03:11 -0500 Subject: Re: Hopkins & Jacobs >From: John Rimmer <johnrimmer.nul> >To: post.nul >Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 19:40:34 +0000 (GMT) >Subject: Re: Hopkins & Jacobs >>From: Jerome Clark <jkclark.nul> >>To: <post.nul> >>Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 14:13:41 -0600 >>Subject: Re: Hopkins & Jacobs >>>Abductionoligy can only continue so long as no-one looks too >>>closely at the practicalities of it. They're like the mediums >>>who don't want you to turn the light on when the psychic >>>tambourine's playing, or the card sharps who won't let you >>>examine the deck too closely. >>I could have sworn that you were talking about the way UFO >>debunkery works, John. >Jerry, I am sure you are aware of, and understand the origins >of, the phrase "He would say that, wouldn't he", as used in >England. And not just in England, John. In fact, the very words leaped to mind when I read your words. Not only would you, but you do. All the time. Sigh, Jerry Clark Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp