From: Dave Haith <visions1.nul> Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 08:31:58 -0000 Archived: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 09:03:55 -0500 Subject: Implant Evidence >From: J. Maynard Gelinas <j.maynard.gelinas.nul> >To: post.nul >Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 11:57:06 -0500 >Subject: Re: Hopkins & Jacobs >>From: Dave Haith <visions1.nul> >>To: UFO UpDates <post.nul> >>Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 16:24:00 -0000 >>Subject: Re: Hopkins & Jacobs >Dave, >Where's the physical evidence? If abductees are regularly >abducted by aliens, then there exists a target for >investigation. One assumes that surveiling a sample of abductees >over time ought to generate not just one instance of recorded >evidence, but a plethora. Repeated again and again. Where is >this evidence in the public record? I haven't seen it. Why not? (Snip) >>Hi Maynard >>I haven't said the whole scene doesn't throw up a lot of >>questions like the lack of physical evidence. >>Some would cite so called implants as evidence (snip) Maynard This isn't my field but I was sent this .pdf report of implant research which you and others might like to peruse: http://tinyurl.com/4sovf9p It seems to suggest in conclusion that this fragment contains technology and is of non-terrestrial origin. Dave Haith Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp