From: Steven Kaeser <steve.nul> Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 11:40:31 -0500 Archived: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 07:11:05 -0500 Subject: Re: Journal Of Scientific Exploration >From: Kevin Randle <KRandle993.nul> >To: post.nul >Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 14:10:52 -0500 (EST) >Subject: Re: Journal Of Scientific Exploration >List, Errol and All - >As some of you will remember, about a decade ago I suggested we >do our peer review using this List as the best source of peer >review. Everyone would be eligible to comment. >I started it with a look at the Mantell case which Errol kindly >put up on the site so that everyone could read it and comment. >As far as I know, no one else ever attempted to do this. >Well, now we are starting it all over again and I applaud the >effort. Let's >figure out how to do it right. Hi Kevin, I believe I recall that exercise and it was fairly comprehensive, but I'm not sure that it reached far beyond the reach of this List. Was the data ever complied, organized and published anywhere? Steve Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp