From: J. Maynard Gelinas <j.maynard.gelinas.nul> Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 15:08:29 -0500 Archived: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 05:32:42 -0500 Subject: Re: Prayer Meditation Cause 'White Orbs' To Respond >From: Ray Dickenson <r.dickenson.nul> >To: <post.nul> >Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2011 23:19:30 -0000 >Subject: Re: Prayer Meditation Cause 'White Orbs' To Respond >>From: Diana Cammack <cammack.nul> >>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <post.nul> >>Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2011 14:19:32 +0200 >>Subject: Re: Prayer Meditation Cause 'White Orbs' To Respond >>Source: UfoExaminer.Com >>http://tinyurl.com/c4muyt6 >>Witness Says Prayer, Meditation Cause 'White Orbs' To Respond >>Roger Marsh ><snip> >>Praying, meditating, shining a light and concentrating, or what >>Tim Good does, 'projecting thoughts' - all much the same really. >>But the question is, how (let alone why!) do these orbs and ETs >>pick up a single person's thinking out of the chaos of all our >>thoughts beaming out from earth to space? Also, what about the >>thoughts we don't want to share with anyone else - do those get >>sent out there too, to be heard by ETs and orbs? >How >>disconcerting is that!? >Hi Diana, >You've hit the nail on the head. Some time ago tried to bring >that particular aspect into consideration. >Here's the quotes: >"they are reported to have the weird ability to detect and react >to the intent, observation and signalling of individual humans, >although we know no way they could isolate one flashing light in >a cityscape (& could anyone imagine any method of sensing `human >intention' or `observation' alone?)." >and later in the doc. >"from lots of reports, slightly mentioned above, Aerial >Phenomena sometimes behave as if they're instantly aware of >things happening a long way away - and we'll include those >accounts of them being sensitive to `intention' and even more >sensitive to flashlights/radar txers being pointed at them. >... >Maybe a bit more scary: that might imply some ability - while >tuned-in at least - to `read minds', or at least intentions. If >so - it's obvious why the top-people would want to keep it >secret. Their speeches wouldn't seem half so imposing if we >could read their thoughts, maybe as subtitles!" List, I have some thoughts to offer: I'm not sure the terms 'telepathy' or 'prayer' are particularly meaningful to the issue at hand. The problem is that these terms represent 'effects' but have no inner ausitive explanation embedded within. Speaking strictly as a layperson, my sense is that a more prosaic explanation is possible that might both explain these observations while at the same time fitting in with recently published 'brain-computer interface' findings. For example, here is a press report about a research team that used a combination of EEG sensors on the head of one person, connected to a computer, and then 'transmitted' to another person quite similarly to what is often termed as 'telepathy'. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/10/091006102637.htm Of course, this technique requires that the subjects remain in a controlled environment with wires dangling off their heads fed into a computer. These electrodes are scattered across a skull in order to detect and record neuron firings which are then processed by computer. However, one could envision a more elegant solution using something akin to holography to generate the same result. Holography is not limited to the recording or transmission of light interference patterns on a photographic plate. Any physical system that can record information in the interference patterns of a set of waves can be said to be holographic. If there existed a system that could record and/or transmit interference patterns in such a way that it could excite neuronal firing within a brain might be used to communicate in a method similar to what most people call 'telepathy'. Human science is now untangling how patterns of neuronal firing can be processed by computer into anything from emotional response to even representations of visual processing. The big question is no longer: Is it possible to read minds? For, now it is. The big question now is, could such a system be devised that could work without the tangle of wires and/or brain implants that are now used by researchers today? If so, I'd argue that some mechanism of holography would be the most likely approach. -M Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp