From: John Velez <jvelez49.nul> Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 10:52:58 -0500 Archived: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 11:31:08 -0500 Subject: Re: Telepathy & UFOs >From: William Treurniet <wtreurniet.nul> >To: post.nul >Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 12:08:25 -0500 >Subject: Re: Telepathy & UFOs >>From: John Velez <jvelez49.nul> >>To: post.nul >>Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 16:23:48 -0500 >>Subject: Telepath & UFOs [was: Prayer Meditation Cause...] >>>From: Diana Cammack<cammack.nul> >>>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto<post.nul> >>>Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2011 14:19:32 +0200 >>>Subject: Re: Prayer Meditation Cause 'White Orbs' To Respond >>>>Source: UfoExaminer.Com >>>>http://tinyurl.com/c4muyt6 >>>>December 15, 2011 >>>>Witness Says Prayer, Meditation Cause 'White Orbs' To Respond >>>>Roger Marsh >>><snip> >>>Praying, meditating, shining a light and concentrating, or what >>>Tim Good does, 'projecting thoughts' - all much the same really. >>>But the question is, how (let alone why!) do these orbs and ETs >>>pick up a single person's thinking out of the chaos of all our >>>thoughts beaming out from earth to space? Also, what about the >>>thoughts we don't want to share with anyone else - do those get >>>sent out there too, to be heard by ETs and orbs? How >>>disconcerting is that!? >>In 1997 I had a daylight sighting of multiple orbs hovering in >>the sky over my house in Queens, N.Y. I was thinking/wishing >>that they would come closer so I could get a better look at >>them. Instantly, as if in response to my request, one of the >>orbs broke formation and rapidly descended toward me. >>It executed a long, low sweeping arc overhead. At its closest >>point of approach the object couldn't have been more than 3/400 >>ft. over my head. It displayed a disc-shape, dull silver >>surface, completely silent. I am convinced that the >>object/occupant(s) had _responded_ to my mental request. >>The other one I wanted to share was a response to a question I >>had asked Budd Hopkins. I was visiting with Budd at his studio >>in NY back in 93'/94' and the conversation centered on hybrids. >>As he spoke, he betrayed a bit of fear, apprehension in regard >>to these alleged hybrids. I asked what it was he feared about >>them and he responded: "They can read your mind, get inside your >>head. I don't like that." >>I have never had anything to hide. I have (from necessity) >>thought about telepathy and all its implications. Never feared >>it though. >>Budd's response made me wonder, more than the obvious invasion >>of privacy, that many people have 'little secrets, little >>traumas, little hurts,' that they don't want anybody to see. >>Perhaps things they feel deep shame over; weaknesses, >>shortcomings, major hidden flaws. His response really drove home >>to me how very primal the fear is of someone/something else >>being able to peruse the content of our minds. To share that >>very personal space. >>Telepathy plays a huge role in anything related to abduction of >>human beings by whoever, whatever is responsible. I pay very >>close attention to any reports/accounts of UFO contact involving >>telepathy/mind to mind contact. It is one component of the >>phenomenon that receives very little time or attention. Yet, it >>is one of the single most revealing aspects. >Hello John, >I can understand the attraction of the source/receiver model of >communication to account for what we call telepathy. <snip> >I think it is more likely that >the UFO existed somehow inside your own personal psychic >boundary unbeknownst to your conscious mind. I would suggest >that the UFO was nonetheless physical and visible to anyone with >you. This model says that you were a participant in creating the >sighting at some unconscious level, so you may naturally have >had some conscious control over the UFO's behavior. You're not serious are you? So you apparently favor a 'Merlinian' explanation for my report. Something involving conjuring physical objects out of the subconscious. William, there were -two- other witnesses (my wife and a friend of my son who was visiting at the time,) and it seems a bit more plausible to me that three individuals observing the same phenomena saw what they say they saw, as opposed to one person 'conjuring' up a vision from their subconscious that was then witnessed by others. I'd believe 'spacemen' before I'd believe it was a physical manifestation of my subconscious mind - that others could also see. Talk about stretching credulity. I thought I was bad! I'm sure you'd like to think that it must be some unconscious manifestation because it makes it so much easier to dismiss the alternative explanation. ie; We saw what we saw - objects of unknown origin or manufacture. I can tell you with sober certainty that what we witnessed was 'there' and I think it's much more of a stretch to think it was a 'mental construct' which assumed physical form and was then independently observed by three individuals. Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar... <grin> John Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp