UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2011 > Dec > Dec 22

Re: Telepathy & UFOs

From: John Velez <jvelez49.nul>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 10:52:58 -0500
Archived: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 11:31:08 -0500
Subject: Re: Telepathy & UFOs

>From: William Treurniet <wtreurniet.nul>
>To: post.nul
>Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 12:08:25 -0500
>Subject: Re: Telepathy & UFOs

>>From: John Velez <jvelez49.nul>
>>To: post.nul
>>Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 16:23:48 -0500
>>Subject: Telepath & UFOs [was: Prayer Meditation Cause...]

>>>From: Diana Cammack<cammack.nul>
>>>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto<post.nul>
>>>Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2011 14:19:32 +0200
>>>Subject: Re: Prayer Meditation Cause 'White Orbs' To Respond

>>>>Source: UfoExaminer.Com


>>>>December 15, 2011

>>>>Witness Says Prayer, Meditation Cause 'White Orbs' To Respond
>>>>Roger Marsh


>>>Praying, meditating, shining a light and concentrating, or what
>>>Tim Good does, 'projecting thoughts' - all much the same really.

>>>But the question is, how (let alone why!) do these orbs and ETs
>>>pick up a single person's thinking out of the chaos of all our
>>>thoughts beaming out from earth to space? Also, what about the
>>>thoughts we don't want to share with anyone else - do those get
>>>sent out there too, to be heard by ETs and orbs? How
>>>disconcerting is that!?

>>In 1997 I had a daylight sighting of multiple orbs hovering in
>>the sky over my house in Queens, N.Y. I was thinking/wishing
>>that they would come closer so I could get a better look at
>>them. Instantly, as if in response to my request, one of the
>>orbs broke formation and rapidly descended toward me.

>>It executed a long, low sweeping arc overhead. At its closest
>>point of approach the object couldn't have been more than 3/400
>>ft. over my head. It displayed a disc-shape, dull silver
>>surface, completely silent. I am convinced that the
>>object/occupant(s) had _responded_ to my mental request.

>>The other one I wanted to share was a response to a question I
>>had asked Budd Hopkins. I was visiting with Budd at his studio
>>in NY back in 93'/94' and the conversation centered on hybrids.
>>As he spoke, he betrayed a bit of fear, apprehension in regard
>>to these alleged hybrids. I asked what it was he feared about
>>them and he responded: "They can read your mind, get inside your
>>head. I don't like that."

>>I have never had anything to hide. I have (from necessity)
>>thought about telepathy and all its implications. Never feared
>>it though.

>>Budd's response made me wonder, more than the obvious invasion
>>of privacy, that many people have 'little secrets, little
>>traumas, little hurts,' that they don't want anybody to see.
>>Perhaps things they feel deep shame over; weaknesses,
>>shortcomings, major hidden flaws. His response really drove home
>>to me how very primal the fear is of someone/something else
>>being able to peruse the content of our minds. To share that
>>very personal space.

>>Telepathy plays a huge role in anything related to abduction of
>>human beings by whoever, whatever is responsible. I pay very
>>close attention to any reports/accounts of UFO contact involving
>>telepathy/mind to mind contact. It is one component of the
>>phenomenon that receives very little time or attention. Yet, it
>>is one of the single most revealing aspects.

>Hello John,

>I can understand the attraction of the source/receiver model of
>communication to account for what we call telepathy.


>I think it is more likely that
>the UFO existed somehow inside your own personal psychic
>boundary unbeknownst to your conscious mind. I would suggest
>that the UFO was nonetheless physical and visible to anyone with
>you. This model says that you were a participant in creating the
>sighting at some unconscious level, so you may naturally have
>had some conscious control over the UFO's behavior.

You're not serious are you? So you apparently favor a
'Merlinian' explanation for my report. Something involving
conjuring physical objects out of the subconscious.

William, there were -two- other witnesses (my wife and a friend
of my son who was visiting at the time,) and it seems a bit more
plausible to me that three individuals observing the same
phenomena saw what they say they saw, as opposed to one person
'conjuring' up a vision from their subconscious that was then
witnessed by others. I'd believe 'spacemen' before I'd believe
it was a physical manifestation of my subconscious mind - that
others could also see. Talk about stretching credulity. I
thought I was bad!

I'm sure you'd like to think that it must be some unconscious
manifestation because it makes it so much easier to dismiss the
alternative explanation. ie; We saw what we saw - objects of
unknown origin or manufacture. I can tell you with sober
certainty that what we witnessed was 'there' and I think it's
much more of a stretch to think it was a 'mental construct'
which assumed physical form and was then independently observed
by three individuals.

Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar... <grin>


Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast



These contents above are copyright of the author and
UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced
without the express permission of both parties and
are intended for educational use only.

[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp

Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com