From: Steven Kaeser <steve.nul> Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 06:29:40 -0500 Archived: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 07:06:23 -0500 Subject: Re: White House Ends Silence On UFOs & ETs With... >From: Edward Gehrman <egehrman.nul> >To: <post.nul> >Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 09:27:40 -0800 >Subject: Re: White House Ends Silence On UFOs & ETs With... <snip> >Hi Jerry, List, EBK, >Yes,I was certainly surprised when I arrived at this possible >solution. It isn't a delusion, just an extrapolation. And even >though "generations of historians, scientists, archaeologists, >paleontologists, ecologists, and other scholars in a range of >disciplines" have studied the phenomenon, they didn't have >footage of the theoretical creatures or the debris from their >crashed craft to study. Convergent evolution wasn't considered >so the mechanism for change wasn't well understood. I'm not all >that brilliant but I have followed the available evidence to its >logical conclusion: most likely,the creature in the Alien >Autopsy is a monotreme. >Betty Hill told both Philip Mantle and me, on different >occasions, that the creatures who abducted her looked the same >as the creature in the AA. Perhaps it's time to reexamine our >assumptions. >I realize that neither I nor others will ever prove, 100%, that >the AA is legitimate, but even after fifteen years of scrutiny, >there still isn't a single scrap of evidence that the AA is >faked or hoaxed, while there is plenty of evidence that it >isn't. Hi Ed, You know that I would support Jerry's position on this, so that doesn't need to be said. But, let's not perpetuate a myth here. There hasn't been a "scrap of evidence" that you are prepared to accept as proof that the AA 'film' [note the quotes] was hoaxed. As you are aware, Spyros Melaris has come forward to seek credit for the hoax, which he created under contract with Ray Santilli. He has provided enough information to convince most of those in contact with him last year that he was indeed seriously involved in creation of the hoax, and you were among a couple of holdouts that wanted to see the 'landing on the white house lawn' type of evidence to prove his case. But I don't want to go over a year's worth of back and forth here, so let's just admit that we disagree. I've CC'd Spyros with this, and if Errol doesn't mind, I'll post any response he might have to this mention. He may not want to respond, and for him this was a business deal, and not an effort to prove anything by a hoax. Spyros understood at the time of the London showing that the hoax would be admitted to fairly quickly, and Spyros would get credit for his work. That didn't happen, with Ray wanting to ride this 'entertainment franchise' as long as he can. For most of us, this is a rather old story that should be put to rest, but for you this appears to be a calling. In the end, you are correct that we'll never prove anything about the 'Alien Autopsy film' to the 100% acceptance level, but let's not count that as proof positive. Steve Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp