From: A. J. Gevaerd - Revista UFO <aj.nul> Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 11:45:09 -0300 Archived: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 07:59:46 -0400 Subject: Re: Leslie Kean Interview And The Trindade Case >From: Kentaro Mori <kentaro.mori.nul> >To: post.nul >Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 16:18:29 -0300 >Subject: Re: Leslie Kean Interview And The Trindade Case >>From: A. J. Gevaerd - Revista UFO <aj.nul> >>To: <post.nul> >>Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 10:12:36 -0300 >>Subject: Leslie Kean Interview And The Trindade Case ><snip> >>The same edition carries an in-depth article about the Trindade >>Island Case written meticulously by our co-editor Marco Antonio >>Petit, a material that completely rejects all allegations that >>the photos made by Almiro Barauna are fake, claims that are >>supported by outsider and skeptics based mostly in second-hand >>or distorted info. >>Petit has been investigating the Trindade Island Case for 30 >>years and is definitely the person who most knows about it. He >>has met, was a close friend and made the most detailed >>interviews with Barauna the man has ever given. The co-editor >>not only rejects the allegations with very solid information, as >>he gives new details of the case that are barely known to the >>World UFO Community. >I have read the recent articles, and found absolutely no new >information regarding the Trindade Case. It's basically just a >long rant against Alexandre Borges' interview with Barauna's >nephew. >It's also outdated. Most importantly, it completely ignores the >statements by the two crewmembers on board at the moment of the >sighting. There are also many other factual errors and outdated >info, such as failing to recognize the Navy report was first >published by APRO, and that the Argentinean republishing of said >report by Ojea was -- as Martin Shough helped me sort out -- >actually a Spanish translation of APRO's translation (which >means it was translated thrice, from Portuguese to English, then >to Spanish, then back to Portuguese, the version which >circulates now in Brazil). <snip> I expected your reaction and feel no need or have no interest in replying to you. However, a few points must be stressed for the knowledge of everyone here: 1. The statements by the two crew members on board at the moment of the sighting will be subject of another specific article. They will be object of a much stronger rejection and correction by Petit, because of the weakness of such testimonies. 2. No news about the real role of Kubitschek in the case? Perhaps to you and to a few more people, very few. Remember we do magazine for general public, which didn't have much of the details you think are outdated or are not anything new. 3. Claudeir Covo's article is not just a republishing, but a version updated by himself. No need to reply. I already know what you have to say. However, since you are a Brazilian and speak Portuguese, why don't deal directly with the authors Petit and Covo what you disagree or feel that needs correction? They will tell you what you need to know. marcoantoniopetit.nul claudeir.covo.nul A. J. Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp