From: Joe McGonagle <joe.mcgonagle.nul> Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 23:13:41 +0100 Archived: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 09:06:18 -0400 Subject: Re: UFO files #8 Released By UK National Archives >From: Gerald O'Connell <goc.nul> >To: post.nul >Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 16:57:20 +0100 >Subject: Re: UFO files #8 Released By UK National Archives >>From: Joe McGonagle <joe.mcgonagle.nul> >>To: post.nul >>Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 14:15:35 +0100 >>Subject: Re: UFO files #8 Released By UK National Archives >>>From: Stanton T. Friedman <fsphys.nul> >>>To: <post.nul> >>>Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 09:05:09 -0300 >>>Subject: Re: UFO files #8 Released By UK National Archives >>>To those who have reviewed the MOD files, would it be correct to >>>assume that no TOP SECRET Files have been released? >>None that haven't been redacted(including their security >>markings) - do you expect there to be some? >Do you expect there to be none? Not any which held the classification only because they were about UFOs. I would not be surprised if there were some that were highly classified because of the source of the information, but I didn't really _expect_ to see them (because the classified documents may not exist, not because they would be removed from the files). However, with entire pages redacted in some files, how can anyone be certain about what the redactions are concealing? Joe Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp